Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment
From the Courts »
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC
 Emami Infrastructure Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Bar Council of India vs. A. K. Balaji & Ors (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-op Society Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-I Vs. Smt. Ritu Singal
 Vinod Kumar Gupta Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-17
 How you can gift and still save tax on top of HRA, tuition fee, more Income Tax Returns (ITR) filing top hack

Suruchi Saree Mandir 95-Parijat, Marine Drive, Mumbai-400002 Vs ITO 14(1)-3, Earnest House, Mumbai.
March, 26th 2014
                                  , ",p"  
                         [ ^ Û],    È, Û 
         Before S/Sh. Rajendra,Accountant Member & Amit Shukla,Judicial Member
          /.ITA No.1118/Mum/2011,[ [/Assessment Year-2007-08
           Suruchi Saree Mandir                      ITO 14(1)-3,
           95-Parijat, Marine Drive,                 Earnest House,
           Mumbai-400002                          Vs Mumbai.

           PAN: AABFS2996J

                    (/ Appellant)                             (× / Respondent)

                   [   / Assessee by                                : None
                      / Revenue by                                  : Shri Pitamber Das
                     / Date of Hearing                              : 19-03-2014

                       / Date of Pronouncement : 19-03-2014
                    , 1961   ( 1 ) 254   Û[    
                      Order u/s.254(1)of the Income-tax Act,1961(Act)
Per Rajendra,AM     Û]    :
Challenging the order dt.28.12.2010 of the CIT(A)-25,Mumbai,assessee has raised following
Grounds of Appeal:

On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals);
Section 50C-Rs.233,689/-
     1) Erred in confirming the action of the assessing officer by confirming addition to short term capital
     gain under section 50C of the Act without considering the fact that the Section 50C of the act, does
     not apply to depreciable assets and relying only on stamp valuation without putting on record any
     positive evidence of higher sale consideration.
     2) On a proper interpretation of section 48, 50 and 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was the
     Assessing Officer right in law in applying section 50C to capital assets covered by section 50
     (depreciable assets) and in computing the capital gains on the sale of depreciable assets by adopting
     the Stamp Duty valuation?
Interest- Rs.2,78,752/-
     3) erred in confirming the disallowances of Rs. 2,78,752/- on account of interest bearing fund
     diverted to non business purpose out of interest expenses of Rs. 731,048/- without appreciating the
     fact that the learned Assessing Officer has not established any nexus between interest bearing funds
     utilized for interest free funds loans & advances;

The Appellant craves, to consider each of the above grounds of appeal without prejudice to each other and
craves leave to add, alter, delete or modify all or any of the above grounds of appeal.

2.Assessee-firm, dealing in purchase and sales of Sarees,filed its return of income on 24.09.2007
declaring total income at Rs. 1.12 lacs.AO finalised the assessment,on 20.12.209,u/s. 143(3) of
the Act,determining the income of the assessee at Rs.6.24 lacs.During the assessment proceedings
AO found that the assessee had shown Short Term Capital Gains (STCG) on sale of flat at Rs.
                                    2                         ITA No. 1118/Mum/2011 Suruchi Saree Mandir.

3.36 lacs.Invoking the provisions of section 50C(3) of the Act, he recalculated the capital gains.
AO also found that assessee had debited Rs. 7.31 lacs under the head `Interest Expense'.He made
addition of Rs.2.78 lacs to the income of the assessee, as he was of the opinion that interest
bearing funds were diverted for non business purposes.

3.Assessee preferred an appeal before the First Appellate Authority (FAA). After considering the
submissions of the assessee he dismissed the appeal filed by it. Matter was fixed for hearing from
time to time. On 23.01.2014 nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee. A hearing notice was sent
by registered post to the address given by the assessee in form no.36.It was mentioned in the
notice that case will be heard on 19.03.2014. Notice was received by the assessee on 03.02.2014.
During the course of hearing before us, nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee nor was any
letter filed for adjourning the case.

4. We have perused the material available on the record. We find that FAA has passed a reasoned
order dealing all the issues raised by the assessee-firm.Therefore, confirming his orders,we decide
ground no. 1 and 2 against the assessee.

                      As a result,appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed.
                           [       .

                       Order pronounced in the open court on 19th March, 2014.
                       Û   19 ekpZ, 2014    

           Sd/-                                                 Sd/-
        ( È/Amit Shukla)                                     (Û]/Rajendra)
 Û  /JUDICIAL MEMBER                                   /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
/Mumbai,/Date: 19th March,2014.
    /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. Assessee /                                              2. Respondent /×
3. The concerned CIT(A)/   ,4.The concerned CIT /  
5. DR "H" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai /  ,p ,..Û.
6. Guard File/[ 
                                     ×  //True Copy//

                                                            / BY ORDER,
                                                    /  Dy./Asst. Registrar
                                                 ,  /ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions