Confederation of Indian Industry 23-26, Institutional area Lodhi road, New Delhi vs. ITO(E), Trust Ward III New Delhi
March, 25th 2014
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCHES : "B" NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI U.B.S.BEDI, JM
SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM
ITA no. 2189/Del/2013
Assessment Year : 2007-08
Confederation of Indian Industry vs. ITO(E), Trust Ward III
23-26, Institutional area New Delhi
Lodhi road, New Delhi
PAN: AAAT CO 188 R
Appellant by:- None
Respondent by:- Sh. Gagan Sood, Sr.D.R.
PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM
This appeal filed by the assessee, is directed against the order of the
Ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXI, New Delhi dated 04.02.2013
pertaining to the Assessment Year 2007-08.
2. On the date of hearing i.e. on 19.03.2014, none appeared on behalf of
the assessee, nor any adjournment application was received inspite of service
of notice to the assessee much well in advance. We find from the record that
on earlier occasions, the appeal has been adjourned on the request of the
assessee. Hence we presume that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting
Page 2 of 3
3. Following the decisions in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India P.Ltd. 38
ITD, 320 (Delhi), and the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the
case of M/s Chemipol vs. UOI and others in Central Excise Appeal No.
62/2009 judgement dt. 17th September,2009, we consider it a fit case for
dismissing the appeal in limine, as not admitted. We may like to clarify that
subsequently, if the assessee explains the reasons for non-appearance and if
the Bench is so satisfied, the matter may be recalled for the purpose of
adjudication of the appeal.
4. In the result, the appeal by the assessee stands dismissed for non
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 19th March, 2014.
(U.B.S. BEDI) (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY)
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: the 19th March,2014
Page 3 of 3
Copy of the Order forwarded to:
1. Appellant; 2.Respondent; 3.CIT; 4.CIT(A); 5.DR; 6.Guard File