sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunalvice President's Secretariat : Hyderabad Constitution Of Hyderabad Benches 16/07/2018 To 23/7/2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal : Kolkata Benches : Kolkata Consolidated List Of Orders Ready For Pronouncement On 18/07/2018.
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal : Bangalore Banches : Bangalore Constitution for the week from 16/7/2018 To 20/7/2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Lucknow Benches. Lucknow Constitution For The Period From 23107/2018 To 27107/2018, 30.07.2018 To 31.07 .201 8 And 01 .08.2018 To 03.08.201 8.
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench List Of Division Bench Cases Posted Before S/shri V Durga Rao, Hon'ble Judicial Member & D S Sunder Singh, Hon'ble Accountant Member During The Period From 16.07.2018 To 27.07.2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches , Ahmedabad S/shri Pramod Kumar, Am & Mahavir Prasad, JM Causelist For Bench 'A' 16-07-2018
 Punj Lloyd Ltd vs. The Commissioner Value Added Tax
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai Consolidated Cause List Of SA/MA/pronojncement For Friday 13.07.2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Constitution Of Benches From 16.07.2018 To 20.07.2018
 New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) vs. ACIT (Supreme Court)(S. 194-I)
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Jaipur Benches Jaipur Constitution for The Period From 09.07.2018 To 20.07.2018

Siemens Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
March, 13th 2013

S. 9(1)(vii): Services rendered by machines is not “fees for technical services”

The assessee made payment to a laboratory in Germany for carrying out certain tests on circuit breakers manufactured by the assessee and to certify that the said circuit breakers met with international standards. The assessee claimed that as the said tests were carried out by sophisticated machines without human intervention, the services did not constitute “fees for technical services” as defined in s. 9(1)(vii) of the Act. The AO & CIT(A) rejected the claim on the ground that the services were “technical” in nature and that even assuming human intervention was necessary, the same was present in the form of humans observing the process, preparing the report, issuance of certificate and monitoring the machines. On appeal by the assessee to the Tribunal, HELD allowing the appeal:

(i) Explanation 2 to s. 9(1)(vii) defines the expression “fees for technical services” to mean “any consideration for the rendering of any managerial, technical or consultancy services”. The word “technical” is preceded by the word “managerial” and succeeded by the word “consultancy”. Applying the principle of noscitur a sociis, as the words “managerial and consultancy” have a definite involvement of a human element, the word “technical” has to be construed in the same sense involving direct human involvement. If services are provided using an equipment or sophisticated machine or standard facility, it cannot be characterized as “technical services” so as to fall within s. 9(1)(vii) (Bharati Cellular Ltd 319 ITR 258 (Del) & Skycell Communications 251 ITR 53 (Mad) followed; fact that Bharati Cellular has been set aside by the SC in Bharat Cellular Ltd 330 ITR 239 (SC) does not affect this principle);

(ii) On facts, the services provided by the German laboratory for testing the circuit breakers was a standard service done automatically by machines and not requiring human intervention. The fact that humans are required for observing the process, preparing the report, issuance of certificate and for monitoring of machines is not a relevant criterion. The test is whether the services are rendered by a human or by a machine. If a human renders the technical services with the aid of a machine, the services are “technical services”. But if the services are rendered by a machine without human interface or intervention, then it is not “technical services” as defined. The mere fact that certificates have been provided by humans after the test is carried out by the machines does not mean that services have been provided by human skills.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Contact Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions