Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: empanelment :: cpt :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd
 
 
« ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches Chennai Constitution For The Week From 20/02/2017 To 23/02/2017 (24102/2017 Declared As Closed Holidav)
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bangalore Benches , Bangalore Causelist for the Week from : 13/02/2017 To 16/02/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches , Ahmedabad S/shri N.K. Billaiya, Am & Mahavir Prasad, JM Causelist For Bench 'B' Date : 13/02/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Benches, Jaipur Constitution For The Period Of 13.02.2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Benches, Ahmedabad Constitution For The Period Of 13.02.2017 To 16.02.2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata. Constitution of Kolkata Benches For One Week From 13.02.2017 To 16.02.2017.(17th February 2017- M.A.Day)
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches, Hyderabad. Constitution For The Period From 13.02.2017 To 23.02.2017.
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Benches, Ahmedabad Notice Cases Fixed Before Ahmedabad ā€œdā€ Bench From 30-01-2017 To 02-02-2017 Are Adjourned As Under :-
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Consolidated list of orders ready for Pronouncement on 08/02/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Jaipur Constitution of Benches From 06/02/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal New Delhi Constitution of Benches From 06/02/2017 To 09/02/2017

ITO vs. M/s MGB Transport (ITAT Kolkata)
March, 29th 2013

S. 40(a)(ia) TDS: Special Bench verdict binding despite suspension by High Court

The assessee paid dumper hire charges of Rs. 36.37 lakhs and claimed it as a deduction. The AO disallowed the claim u/s 40(a)(ia) on the ground that the assessee had not deducted TDS thereon u/s 194C. Before the Tribunal, the assessee argued that it was not liable to deduct TDS u/s 194C as there was only no “contractual agreement”. In the alternative, it was argued that in accordance with the Special Bench judgement in Merilyn Shipping 136 ITD 23 (SB), the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) had to be confined to the amounts “payable” as at the end of the year and it did not apply to the amounts already paid during the year. The assessee also argued that though the Andhra Pradesh High Court had granted an “interim suspension” against the said judgement of the Special Bench, it was still binding. HELD by the Tribunal:

The argument that s. 194C does not apply in the absence of a written contractual agreement is not acceptable. Even a verbal contract is sufficient. As regards the judgement of the Special Bench in Merilyn Shipping 136 ITD 23 (SB) where the view was taken that s. 40(a)(ia) can apply only to the amounts remaining payable as at the end of the year and not to the amounts paid during the year, though the Andhra Pradesh High Court has granted “interim suspension” of the said judgement, the said stay/ suspension applies only to the parties to that proceeding and does not destroy the binding effect of the judgement of the Special Bench. There is a difference between “stay of operation” of an order and “quashing of an order”. While, in the case of a “quashing”, the order of the lower court ceases to exist, in the case of a “stay”, the order of the lower court continues to operate and have binding effect. Accordingly, the judgement of the Special Bench in Merilyn Shipping still holds ground and the TDS provisions will apply, for purposes of invocation of s. 40(a)(ia), only on the amounts remaining payable at the end of the year and not on the amounts paid (Shree Chamund Mopeds Ltd. vs. Church of South India Trust Association AIR 1992 SC 1439, 1444 & Pijush Kanti Chowdhury vs. State of West Bengal 2007 (3) CHN 178 followed).

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Development Software Programming Software Engineering Custom Software Development Requirement Based Software Development Software Solutions Software Serv

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions