sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
« News Headlines »
 New direct tax code may have to wait until 2019
 New direct tax code may have to wait until 2019
 New direct tax code may have to wait until 2019
 New direct tax code may have to wait until 2019
 How to use your Form 16
 Which ITR form applies to you for financial year 2017-18?
 Income tax returns filing form-2 released; should you use it? Find out
  Are you planning to file ITR 1 form? here's how to do it Income Tax Return (ITR) filing
 30 LPA-Opening Financial Controller
 ITR form 2 in java release by CBDT for return filing by individuals
 How to file your income tax return using ITR Form-1 Income Tax efiling for AY 2018-19

HC rejects Sterlites plea challenging reopening of I-T assessment for 2000-01
March, 25th 2008
The Madras High Court has rejected the plea of Tuticorin-based Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd that the order of Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle VI(4), Chennai, to reopen assessment for year 2000-01 be set aside as it was without jurisdiction.

Mr. Justice K. Chandru in his recent order held that it was only required to see whether there was any prima facie material available on the basis of which Department could reopen the file. In view of the counter-affidavit of the Department, and impugned notice of July 17, 2007, this court could not reject the case of Revenue for invoking power under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to reopen assessment.

According to petitioner, the department had held that they had received information from Enforcement Directorate (ED), which showed possible inflation of purchases on certain items. Petitioner contended that the notice issued by the department was without jurisdiction and contrary to Sections 147, 148 and 149. The information allegedly received from ED did not relate to the relevant assessment year, and that no import of any design or drawing was made during year 2000-01.

Also, the notice was barred by limitation, according to petitioner. An additional affidavit was also filed by petitioner on September 1, 2007 stating that copy of order obtaining previous sanction of Commissioner of Income-tax was not provided. The respondents in their counter said that previous sanction of Commissioner was obtained.

The Judge held that the definite stand of Dept was that previous sanction from Commissioner of I. Tax was obtained, and credible information received related to year 2000-01. In the light of the above, the writ petition failed, and the same shall stand dismissed.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Mission

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions