Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 BackBack Income Tax Act amendment on cards on tax treatment of MSME dues
 ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 available for e-filing. Check details here
 Income tax slabs FY 2024-25: Experts share these 8 benefits for taxpayers in new income tax regime
 How To File ITR Online - Step by Step Guide to Efile Income Tax Return, FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)
 Old or new tax regime for TDS on salary? This post-election 2024 event will impact your tax planning
 What Are 5 Heads Of Income Tax?
 Income Tax Dept releases interim action plan for FY25 on tax collection, refund approvals
  Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80
 Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80
 Why you need not rush to file your ITR immediately
 Income tax returns: ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 available for e-filing

CLB share transfer order flayed
March, 13th 2007
The order of the Company Law Board (CLB) directing the West Bengal Industrial Corporation (WBIDC) to transfer its 1.55 million shares in Haldia Petrochemical Ltd (HPL) to the Chatterjee Group lead by Purnendu Chatterjee was criticised by the Counsel of WBIDC before Mr Justice Jayanta Kumar Biswas of the Calcutta High Court today.

In his argument, the WBIDC counsel described the CLB order as a classic one, because there was no such prayer for transfer of shares before the CLB. The Chatterjee Group made an application before CLB under Section 397 of the Companies Act, under which the Board passed an order directing WBIDC to transfer 1.55 million shares in HPL to the TCG. Challenging this order, both the West Bengal Government and WBIDC filed two appeals in the Calcutta High Court.

The counsel for WBIDC questioned that under Section 397, shareholders of a company can file an application of mismanagement against the company, but surprisingly in the present case no allegation of mismanagement was made against HPL by the Chatterjee Group; hence, how the application under Section 397 has been entertained by the Board, it was pointed out. WBIDC was not willing to transfer the shares, the counsel argued. The order of CLB is perverse as it appeared from the totality of fact, the counsel submitted. The hearing will continue.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting