Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
News Headlines »
 Tax Return Preparer (Amendment) Scheme, 2018
 Tax-saving for young earners simplified
 How to save income tax? Here are 6 investments with tax free income
 10 Top salary deductions that can save tax for you
 What are the tax saving options beyond Section 80C?
 The penalties for not paying tax on time
 How to make your salary tax efficient
 I-T Department may go into overdrive this quarter
 Ways to reduce the TDS deduction from your salary
 4 Tips for choosing who prepares your 2017 Tax Returns
 Processing of income-tax returns under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act which were filed in Forms ITR-1 to 6 & applicability of section 143(1)(a)(vi)

A painful twist in the ESOP tale
March, 03rd 2007
The ESOP benefits springing out of employment ought to be taxed in the hands of the benefiting employees and not in the hands of the employers providing them.

"But how can we pay the tax?" remonstrated the Nasscom man.

"Why, what is the problem?" asked the minister arching his eyebrows.

"But Sir, where is the income, I mean liquidity", sputtered Nasscom man.

The minister nodded his head sagely as if a new pearl of wisdom has been dinned into his ears and promised to scrap the scheme. The Nasscom team thanked the minister profusely grinning from ear to ear and went away. It was perhaps the first and the last business lobby to go back completely pleased.

The above conversation is purely fictional, but not its outcome. The IT industry, which was on a high then as indeed it is even now, particularly fond of rewarding its employees through stock options, was naturally miffed when the Finance Act, 1999 sought to introduce a regime to tax the difference between the market price of the shares on the date of the exercise of option and the offer price as a perquisite.

The IT sector was aghast and made its point tellingly. If the market price is Rs 4,000 per share and the offer price is Rs 400 per share, how can an employee to whom 1000 shares have been offered pay tax on Rs 36 lakh, asked the sector, genuinely horrified at the prospect of having to pay tax on notional income, given the fact that the shares admittedly have not been sold.

Undisguised delight

The then minister capitulated. The result was withdrawal of the offending provision the very next year and with an express alternative provision in the opposite direction nothing in this regard is taxable. The employees were jubilant. That they have to pay tax in any case when they sell the shares obtained under ESOP did not worry them a wee bit. For, they knew what they made on sale was capital gain. They also knew that if they sat tight on those shares for one full year, they would don the robes of long-term capital assets. They further knew that long-term capital gains from shares are taxed lightly. Later on to their undisguised delight, tax was completely abolished on long-term capital gains earned through recognised bourses. The bottomline no tax at all either at the time of exercise of option or at the time of sale.

Beneficiaries spared

Seven years later, the emperor has struck back, but not at the employees as he must have but at their employers. Yes, Budget 2007, proposes to impose Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) at 33.99 per cent on the same amount which the Minister in 1999 had calculated. If the then minister was guilty of complete capitulation, Mr P. Chidambaram is now guilty of not taxing the beneficiaries who admittedly are the employees.

The employee lobby was right when it said that no one should be taxed on an unrealised gain. What the then minister ought to have done is to postpone the tax liability to the point of sale at which point tax could have been collected under two heads difference between market price on the date of exercise of option and the offer price being taxed as salary, and the difference between the selling price and the market price on the date of exercise of option being treated as capital gains. Because no one can seriously gainsay the fact that the concession in the offer price vis--vis the market price is purely due to employer-employee relationship.

That such concession is slowly dwindling does not detract from the intrinsic merit of this argument. There is a parallel for postponing the tax liability to the point of actual sale when there is a dual tax liability Section 45(2) that provides a fair regime for taxing the gains on account of conversion of one's capital asset into stock-in-trade.

FBT should be resorted to, if at all, only to vicariously reach out to difficult-to-pigeon-hole categories of beneficiaries of company expenses. The callous use of the FBT regime to tax as many employee-related expenses as possible does injustice to employers, besides being soft on the employees. On this touchstone, the ESOP benefits springing out of employment ought to be taxed in the hands of the benefiting employees and not in the hands of the employers providing them. The Government ought not to abandon equity in pursuit of ease-of-collection.

S. Murlidharan
(The author is a Delhi-based chartered accountant.)

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Company Overview

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions