News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
« From the Courts »
 CRM Services India Pvt. Ltd., 220, Vinobha Puri, Lajpat Nagar-II, New Delhi. Vs. ACIT, Circle-6(2), CR Building, New Delhi
 Reed & Pick Impex (P) Ltd., Opposite ITI, GT Road, Panipat Haryana – 132103 Vs. ITO, Ward-5, Panipat
 Alcatel Lucent India Ltd. (β€˜ALIL’) 202-206, Tolstoy House, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Vs. Addl CIT, Special Range-1, Room No. 159A, C.R. Building, I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110001
 Whirlpool of India Ltd., Plot No. 40, Whirlpool House, Sector-44, Gurgaon-122002, Haryana vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, LTU, Delhi
 Smt. Abha Gupta, 292, Tagore Park Extn. Model Town-I, Delhi – 110 009. Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 20 (4), New Delhi.
 Raj Kumar Sharma, 157, Dda Office Complex, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi – 110 055 Vs Acit, Circle 61(1), New Delhi .
 Evergain Securities (P) Ltd., C/o Raj Kumar&Associates,Ca L-7a(Lgf), South Extension Part-Ii, New Delhi Vs. Ito, Ward 8(4), New Delhi
 DCIT Circle 17(1), New Delhi vs. M/s. Mosaic India Pvt. Ltd. Y-65, Ground Floor, Hauz Khas, New Delhi- 110016
 Gaurav Garg, Near Sharma Pathology, Jarcha Road, Dadri, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. Vs. ITO Ward 3(1) Noida.
 Shri Karam Chand, s/o. Shri Malik Ditta, C/o. M/s. Kissan Agro Hospital, Fatehabad. Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 1, Fatehabad.
 Dynamix India Drill – Con Co. G-4, 208-209, Sector-16, Rohini, New Delhi-110085 Vs. DCIT Circle – 62 (1) New Delhi

Addagio Overseas, 1/18-B, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi-110 026 vs. ACIT Central Circle-26 New Delhi
February, 01st 2019
               INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                DELHI BENCH "SMC": NEW DELHI

       BEFORE      SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                   ITA Nos.:- 4297,4298/Del/2018
                     Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2010-11


     Addagio Overseas,                      ACIT
     1/18-B, Asaf Ali Road,                 Central Circle-26
     New Delhi-110 026               Vs.    New Delhi
                                            Pan AAFFA4164Q
     (Appellant)                            (Respondent)




      Assessee by:         Shri S.K. Chaturvedi, CA
      Department by :      Shri S.L. Anuragi Sr. DR
      Date of Hearing      30/01/2019
      Date of               31/01/2019
      pronouncement


                              ORDER

      The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against
impugned order dated 1.5.2018 passed by Ld. CIT(A) 29 New Delhi in
relation to the penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for the assessment
year 2011-12. The assessee is mainly aggrieved by levy of penalty of
Rs. 3,09,000/- made on account of disallowance of commission
/brokerage on purchases.

2.    The facts in brief are that assessee was engaged in the business
of manufacturing of garments of various brands. During the year
assessee has claimed brokerage/commission on purchase of Rs.
10,47,592/-. AO disallowed the entire brokerage. Before the AO
assessee had submitted confirmation letters of the parties, copy of
their Income Tax Return and their bank account. However, the AO has
made the disallowance on the ground that the assessee could not
produce the parties. In the appellate proceedings, addition of Rs. 10
lacs was confirmed up till the stage of the Tribunal. Thus, on the basis
of such an addition Ld. AO has levied penalty of Rs. 3,09,000/- on
account of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. Ld. CIT (A)
has confirmed the said penalty.






3.     After hearing both the parties and on perusal of the relevant
finding given in the impugned order, it is seen that disallowance of Rs.
10 lacs was made in the quantum proceedings on the ground that
brokerage /commission could not be proved to be genuine, although
the copy of confirmation, income tax return etc. filed by the parties
directly before the AO in response to summon made u/s 131. The sole
reason for disallowance in the quantum proceedings was that, none of
these persons could be produced for a deposition when the assessee
was asked to produce these persons. Hence solely on this reasoning it
was held that assessee could not prove the claim to be genuine.
However, such a finding given in the quantum proceedings could not
be held to be conclusive to hold that assessee is also guilty for
furnishing of inaccurate particular of income so as to warrant penalty
u/s 271(1)(c). The assessee has been paying brokerage/ commission
in the earlier year also and in order to prove the claim, the parties
have directly sent confirmations, their income tax returns, bank
statement etc. to show that these commissions have been paid to them
on account of purchases. Thus, the primary onus cast upon the
assessee, stood discharged and even if these persons could not be
produced or did not appear inspite of summon u/s 131, that does not
mean the material and evidence filed by the assessee was incorrect or
has been found to be false. Assessee was able to substantiate its claim
though such a claim did not found favour only for the reason that






                                   2
these parties did not appear. There is no other material or evidence on
record to show that such payment of brokerage / commission is bogus
or is coloured transaction. Accordingly, under these facts and
circumstances no penalty can be levied for furnishing of inaccurate
particulars of income and same is directed to be deleted.

4.        In the result appeals of the assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on            31st     January, 2019.

                                                        Sd/-

                                                         (AMIT SHUKLA)
                                                        JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated:         31/01/2019
Veena
Copy forwarded to
     1.   Applicant
     2.   Respondent
     3.   CIT
     4.   CIT (A)
     5.   DR:ITAT
                                                    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

                                                          ITAT, New Delhi




                                        3

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2019 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Careers

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions