Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: list of goods taxed at 4%
 
 
From the Courts »
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. M/s. Maruti Udyog Ltd
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 Vs. M/s. Mohan Export India Private Limited
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Oriental International Co. Pvt. Ltd.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Vs. British Motor Car Co.(1934) Ltd
  Vidyadayani Shiksha Samiti vs. CIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Halcrow Consulting India Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 ACIT vs. TRN Energy Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
 Aditya Chemicals Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 Gayatri Aggarwal Vs. Income Tax Commissioner & Ors.
 Paradigm Geophysical Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3, New Delhi
 Download Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017

Shri Inderraj Sadharam Nandrajog, Nandrajog Industries, Lake road, Bhandup Mumbai-400078 Vs. The Dy.Director of Income Tax Circle-23(1), Mumbai.
February, 05th 2015
                    ,   "" 
      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "I" BENCH, MUMBAI

      BEFORE S/SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, (AM) AND AMIT SHUKLA, (JM)
        .      .  ,   ,     ,                            

                    ./I.T.A. No.3056/Mum/2013
                   (   / Assessment Year 2006-07)


 Shri Inderraj Sadharam           / The Dy.Director of Income Tax
 Nandrajog,                           Circle-23(1),
                                  Vs.
 Nandrajog Industries, Opp.Kay        Mumbai.
 Cee Ind. Ltd.,
 Lake road,
 Bhandup (W),
 Mumbai-400078
        ( /Appellant)               ..      (     / Respondent)



           . /   . /PAN/GIR No. :AAGPN8564J



                / Assessee by               Dr.P.Daniel

                 / Revenue by               Shri Asghar Zain V P



               / Date of Hearing
                                                 :   2.2.2015
              /Date of Pronouncement : 2.2.2015

                                / O R D E R

PER N. K. BILLAIYA (AM)

       This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of
the    ld.    CIT(A)-36,   Mumbai        dated    30.11.2011    pertaining   to
assessment year 2006-07.
2.     The assessee has raised several substantive grounds of

appeal.       At the very outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee stated

that the assessee could not attend the assessment proceedings
                                         2                        3 0 5 6 / Mu m / 2 0 1 3

because he was admitted in hospital and, therefore, could not present

his case properly before the AO. The ld. Counsel further stated that

this fact was brought to the notice of the ld. CIT(A) but without any

success.
3. We have carefully perused the orders of the authorities below. It is an undisputed fact that the assessment is made under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). It is also an admitted fact that the reasons were explained before the ld. CIT(A) for not attending the assessment proceedings. Therefore, in the interests of justice and fair play, we restore the issue to the file of the AO. The AO is directed to decide the issue afresh after giving a reasonable and fair opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is directed to attend the assessment proceedings and file all the necessary details/documents as may be called for by the AO.
4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. The above order was pronounced in the open court on 2nd Feb, 2015. nd 2 Feb, 2015 sd sd ( / AMIT SHUKLA) (. . , / N. K. BILLAIYA) / JUDICIAL MEMBER / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai: 2nd Feb,2015. . ../ SRL , Sr. PS 3 3 0 5 6 / Mu m / 2 0 1 3 /Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. / The Appellant 2. / The Respondent. 3. () / The CIT(A)- concerned 4. / CIT concerned 5. , , / DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned 6. / Guard file. / BY ORDER, true copy (Asstt. Registrar) , /ITAT, Mumbai
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions