Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: due date for vat payment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
From the Courts »
  Micro Spacematrix Solution P Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 Micro Spacematrix Solution P Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Greenfield Hotels & Estates Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 IndiaBulls Financial Services Ltd vs. DCIT (Delhi High Court)
 Maharao Bhim Singh of Kota vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)

Shri Inderraj Sadharam Nandrajog, Nandrajog Industries, Lake road, Bhandup Mumbai-400078 Vs. The Dy.Director of Income Tax Circle-23(1), Mumbai.
February, 05th 2015
                    ,   "" 
      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "I" BENCH, MUMBAI

      BEFORE S/SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, (AM) AND AMIT SHUKLA, (JM)
        .      .  ,   ,     ,                            

                    ./I.T.A. No.3056/Mum/2013
                   (   / Assessment Year 2006-07)


 Shri Inderraj Sadharam           / The Dy.Director of Income Tax
 Nandrajog,                           Circle-23(1),
                                  Vs.
 Nandrajog Industries, Opp.Kay        Mumbai.
 Cee Ind. Ltd.,
 Lake road,
 Bhandup (W),
 Mumbai-400078
        ( /Appellant)               ..      (     / Respondent)



           . /   . /PAN/GIR No. :AAGPN8564J



                / Assessee by               Dr.P.Daniel

                 / Revenue by               Shri Asghar Zain V P



               / Date of Hearing
                                                 :   2.2.2015
              /Date of Pronouncement : 2.2.2015

                                / O R D E R

PER N. K. BILLAIYA (AM)

       This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of
the    ld.    CIT(A)-36,   Mumbai        dated    30.11.2011    pertaining   to
assessment year 2006-07.
2.     The assessee has raised several substantive grounds of

appeal.       At the very outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee stated

that the assessee could not attend the assessment proceedings
                                         2                        3 0 5 6 / Mu m / 2 0 1 3

because he was admitted in hospital and, therefore, could not present

his case properly before the AO. The ld. Counsel further stated that

this fact was brought to the notice of the ld. CIT(A) but without any

success.
3. We have carefully perused the orders of the authorities below. It is an undisputed fact that the assessment is made under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). It is also an admitted fact that the reasons were explained before the ld. CIT(A) for not attending the assessment proceedings. Therefore, in the interests of justice and fair play, we restore the issue to the file of the AO. The AO is directed to decide the issue afresh after giving a reasonable and fair opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is directed to attend the assessment proceedings and file all the necessary details/documents as may be called for by the AO.
4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. The above order was pronounced in the open court on 2nd Feb, 2015. nd 2 Feb, 2015 sd sd ( / AMIT SHUKLA) (. . , / N. K. BILLAIYA) / JUDICIAL MEMBER / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai: 2nd Feb,2015. . ../ SRL , Sr. PS 3 3 0 5 6 / Mu m / 2 0 1 3 /Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. / The Appellant 2. / The Respondent. 3. () / The CIT(A)- concerned 4. / CIT concerned 5. , , / DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned 6. / Guard file. / BY ORDER, true copy (Asstt. Registrar) , /ITAT, Mumbai
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions