Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
From the Courts »
 The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 Vs. Inter Globe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd.
 Akum Drugs And Pharmaceuticals Limited Through: Director Shri. Sanjeev Jain Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1) & Anr.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-2 New Delhi Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns „n? Petals
 Prabhatam Investment Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Laxman Industrial Resources Pvt.Ltd (Delhi High Court)
  State Of Jharkhand vs. Lalu Prasad Yadav (Supreme Court)
 CIT vs. Krishan K. Aggarwal (Supreme Court)
 Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate, Delhi
 Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Vs. Vishwa Hindu Parishad
 ITAT Proposes Important Changes To Tribunal Rules
 Meherjee Cassinath Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Ramesh Batta, 81/210, Kaulagarh, Rajender Nagar, Dehradun Vs. ACIT, Cent. Circle, Dehradun.
February, 24th 2015
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                   DELHI BENCH `F': NEW DELHI

      BEFORE SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                            AND
             SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                         ITA No. 4513/Del/2013
                       Assessment Year: 2008-09

     Ramesh Batta,                              ACIT,
     81/210, Kaulagarh,           Vs.           Cent. Circle,
     Rajender Nagar,                            Dehradun.
     Dehradun.
     ABGPB1527N

     (Appellant)                                (Respondent)

                   Appellant by: Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv.
                   Respondent by: Sh. Vivek Wadekar, CIT(DR)


                               ORDER

PER S.V. MEHROTRA, A.M.

     This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ld.

CIT(A), New Delhi dated 27/01/2011 for A.Y. 2008-09.




2.   Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual deriving

income from house property, interest and remuneration from firms, trading

business in lands and capital gains.     A search was carried out in the

premises of the assessee on 04.03.2009 and the assessment was made at a

total income of Rs. 5,66,81,810/- u/s 153A(1)(b) read with sub-section

143(3). The assessee preferred appeal before ld. CIT(A) who dismissed the

appeal in view of the order passed by ld. CIT(A), Central Circle, Kanpur u/s
                                 ITA No. 4513/D/ 2013                       2


  263 dated 15/03/2013. At the time of hearing, ld. Counsel for the assessee

  filed before us a copy of Tribunal's order in the proceedings u/s 263, wherein

  the Tribunal quashed the order passed u/s 263 observing as under:

        6.1 "In the case on hand the ld. CIT(A) has deleted the addition of 65%
        made for the A.Ys. 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. The appeal for the
        A.Y. 2008-09 is pending before the ld. CIT(A). Consistent with the view
        taken in the case of M/s R.B. Enterprises (supra) we quash all these
        orders passed u/s 263 of the Act and allow the appeals of the assessee."
  3.    Since the Tribunal has quashed the 263 proceedings, we restore the




  matter to the file of ld. CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits.

  4.    In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

        Order pronounced in the open court on 20/02/2015

          Sd/-                                                   Sd/-
      (H.S. SIDHU)                                         (S.V. MEHROTRA)
    JUDICIAL MEMBER                                     ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 20/02/2015
*Kavita

Copy to:
       1.   Appellant
       2.   Respondent
       3.   CIT
       4.   CIT(A)
       5.   DR, ITAT, New Delhi.
                              TRUE COPY
                                                                           By Order


                                                        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Web Application Development Web based Software Solution Web Application Deployment Web Application Solutions Web Application Software Development Web Application Deployment Web Application Programming Web Application Design and Development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions