Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: empanelment :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd :: cpt
 
 
From the Courts »
 M/s Fiberfill Engineers Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Del Vs. Mrs. Tara Sinha
 Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, New Delhi & Ors.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3 Vs. Delhi State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corp. Ltd.
 CIT vs. D. K. Garg (Delhi High Court)
 The Citizens Cooperative Society Ltd vs. ACIT (Supreme Court)
 Digipro Import & Export Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
  CIT vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (Supreme Court)
  DCIT vs. Hita Land Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
 GTC Industries Limited vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) (Special Bench)
 Premlata Purshottam Paldiwal vs. CIT (Bombay High Court)

Ramesh Batta, 81/210, Kaulagarh, Rajender Nagar, Dehradun Vs. ACIT, Cent. Circle, Dehradun.
February, 24th 2015
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                   DELHI BENCH `F': NEW DELHI

      BEFORE SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                            AND
             SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                         ITA No. 4513/Del/2013
                       Assessment Year: 2008-09

     Ramesh Batta,                              ACIT,
     81/210, Kaulagarh,           Vs.           Cent. Circle,
     Rajender Nagar,                            Dehradun.
     Dehradun.
     ABGPB1527N

     (Appellant)                                (Respondent)

                   Appellant by: Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv.
                   Respondent by: Sh. Vivek Wadekar, CIT(DR)


                               ORDER

PER S.V. MEHROTRA, A.M.

     This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ld.

CIT(A), New Delhi dated 27/01/2011 for A.Y. 2008-09.




2.   Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual deriving

income from house property, interest and remuneration from firms, trading

business in lands and capital gains.     A search was carried out in the

premises of the assessee on 04.03.2009 and the assessment was made at a

total income of Rs. 5,66,81,810/- u/s 153A(1)(b) read with sub-section

143(3). The assessee preferred appeal before ld. CIT(A) who dismissed the

appeal in view of the order passed by ld. CIT(A), Central Circle, Kanpur u/s
                                 ITA No. 4513/D/ 2013                       2


  263 dated 15/03/2013. At the time of hearing, ld. Counsel for the assessee

  filed before us a copy of Tribunal's order in the proceedings u/s 263, wherein

  the Tribunal quashed the order passed u/s 263 observing as under:

        6.1 "In the case on hand the ld. CIT(A) has deleted the addition of 65%
        made for the A.Ys. 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. The appeal for the
        A.Y. 2008-09 is pending before the ld. CIT(A). Consistent with the view
        taken in the case of M/s R.B. Enterprises (supra) we quash all these
        orders passed u/s 263 of the Act and allow the appeals of the assessee."
  3.    Since the Tribunal has quashed the 263 proceedings, we restore the




  matter to the file of ld. CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits.

  4.    In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

        Order pronounced in the open court on 20/02/2015

          Sd/-                                                   Sd/-
      (H.S. SIDHU)                                         (S.V. MEHROTRA)
    JUDICIAL MEMBER                                     ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 20/02/2015
*Kavita

Copy to:
       1.   Appellant
       2.   Respondent
       3.   CIT
       4.   CIT(A)
       5.   DR, ITAT, New Delhi.
                              TRUE COPY
                                                                           By Order


                                                        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Web Application Development Web based Software Solution Web Application Deployment Web Application Solutions Web Application Software Development Web Application Deployment Web Application Programming Web Application Design and Development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions