Latest Expert Exchange Queries

Make your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
From the Courts »
 Pr CIT vs. Shri Mahila Sewa Sahakari Bank Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
 Pr CIT Vs. PPC Business And Products Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court)
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii Vs. M/s. Radico Khaitan Ltd.
 Mastech Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 Vs. Surya Vinayak Industires Ltd.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-3 Vs. J.H. Business India Pvt. Ltd.
 CIT vs. Bhushan Steels And Strips Ltd (Delhi High Court)
 Sumana Bandyopadhyay vs. DDIT (Calcutta High Court)
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Vardhman Industries Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Bhushan Steels And Strips Ltd.
 Pr CIT vs. M/s Veer Gems (Gujarat High Court)

M/s Brushman (India) Ltd., B-95/3, Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi Vs. ACIT (OSD), CIT-I, New Delhi
February, 24th 2015
                 DELHI BENCH `A', NEW DELHI
          Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Sh. C. M. Garg, JM
              ITA No. 1760/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09
M/s Brushman (India) Ltd.,          Vs ACIT (OSD), CIT-I,
B-95/3, Naraina Industrial Area,       New Delhi
Phase-I, New Delhi
(APPELLANT)                             (RESPONDENT)
            Assessee by : None
            Revenue by : Y. Kakkar, DR
Date of Hearing : 23.02.2015       Date of Pronouncement : 23.02.2015

Per N. K. Saini, AM:

      This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated
12.01.2012 of ld. CIT(A)-VI, New Delhi.

2.    During the course of hearing nobody was present on
behalf of the assessee. The notice of hearing issued on
20.10.2014 was sent to the assessee at the address mentioned
in the impugned order and the assessment order which had not
been returned by the postal authority. The Registry has also
pointed out that this appeal is barred by limitation by 66 days.
It, therefore, appears that the assessee is not interested to
prosecute the matter.
2 ITA No. 1760/Del/2012 Brushman (India) Ltd. 3. The law aids those who are vigilant, not those who sleep upon their rights. This principle is embodied in well known dictum, "VIGILANTIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT'. Considering the facts and keeping in view the provisions of rule 19(2) of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules as were considered in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India Ltd., (38 ITD 320)(Del), we treat this appeal as unadmitted. 4. Similar view has been taken by the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT (223 ITR 480) wherein it has been held as under: "if the party, at whose instance the reference is made, fails to appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the court is not bound to answer the reference." 5. Similarly, Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of New Diwan Oil Mills vs. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495) returned the reference unanswered since the assessee remained absent and there was not any assistance from the assessee. 6. Their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) held that the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursuing the same. 3 ITA No. 1760/Del/2012 Brushman (India) Ltd. 7. So by respectfully following the view taken in the cases cited supra, we dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. 8. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. (Order Pronounced in the Court on 23/02/2015) Sd/- Sd/- (C. M Garg) (N. K. Saini) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 23/02/2015 *Subodh* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5.DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Reengineering Software Re-engineering Software Reverse Engineering Software Reverse Development Software Change Modulation Software Conversion Software Re-creation Software Re-development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions