Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: empanelment :: TDS :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
From the Courts »
 Micro Spacematrix Solution P Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Greenfield Hotels & Estates Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 IndiaBulls Financial Services Ltd vs. DCIT (Delhi High Court)
 Maharao Bhim Singh of Kota vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a

Cargill Incorporated, 15407, McGinity Road, West Wayzata, Minnesota-005391, VS. Assistant Director of Income Tax, Circle 1(1), International Taxation, New Delhi
February, 25th 2014
                IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                     DELHI BENCH "B", NEW DELHI
              BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                                        AND
              SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


                           I.T.A. Nos. 491-492/ Del/
                           2012, 5647-5648/Del/
                           2011, 446-447/Del/
                           2012 & 5503/Del/2010
                             A.Yrs. : 2002-03, 2003-
                               04, 2004-05, 2008-
                            09,2005-06, 2006-07 &
                                      2007-08
Cargill Incorporated,             VS.                    Assistant Director of
15407,                                                   Income Tax,
McGinity Road, West                                      Circle 1(1),
Wayzata,                                                 International
Minnesota-005391,                                        Taxation,
                                                         New Delhi
USA
(PAN: AACCC4786G)
(APPELLANT)                                              (RESPONDENT)

            Assessee by                  :     None.
           Department by                 :     Mrs. Sudha Kumari, CIT(DR)


                                 ORDER
PER BENCH
     These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the
separate    orders   of    the    Ld.        Assessing   Officer,   New     Delhi
u/s. 147/143(3) read with Section 144C of the I.T. Act for the
separate assessment years.

2.   At the outset, we note that there is no valid Power of Attorney in
these cases. Hence, there is no person properly authorized to argue
these cases. In these circumstances, we are of the opinion that the
assessee is not keen to pursue its appeals. Under the circumstances,






                                         1
all the appeals         are liable to be dismissed on account of non-
prosecution.

3.        In our above view, we find support from the following decisions:
     1. In the case of CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee and another, reported
          in 118 ITR 461 [relevant pages 477 & 478] wherein their
          Lordships have held that:
              "The appeal does not mean merely filing of the appeal but
              effectively pursuing it."


     2. In the case of Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT; 223 ITR
          480 (M.P.) while dismissing the reference made at the instance of
          the assessee in default made following observation in their order:
               "If the party, at whose instance the reference is made,
               fails to appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for
               preparation of the paper books so as to enable hearing
               of the reference, the court is not bound to answer the
               reference."


     3.     In the case of Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India
            (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del), the appeal filed by the revenue
            before the Tribunal, which was fixed for hearing. But on the
            date of hearing nobody represented the revenue/appellant nor
            any communication for adjournment was received. There was
            no communication or information as to why the revenue chose
            to remain absent on that date. The Tribunal on the basis of
            inherent powers, treated the appeal filed by the revenue as un-
            admitted in view of the provisions of Rule 19 of the Appellate
            Tribunal Rules, 1963.







                                          2
4.    The assessee, if so desired, shall be free to move this Tribunal

praying for recalling this order and explaining reasons for non-

compliance etc. then this order may be recalled.

5.    In the result,   all the appeals filed by the assessee, are
dismissed, for non-prosecution.
      Order pronounced in the Open Court on 17/2/2014, upon conclusion
of hearing.




      Sd/-                                         Sd/-

         BEDI]
 [U.B.S. BEDI]                               [SHAMIM YAHYA]
JUDICIAL MEMBER                              ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Date 17/2/2014
"SRBHATNAGAR"
Copy forwarded to: -
1.    Appellant -

2.    Respondent -
3.    CIT
4.    CIT (A)
5.    DR, ITAT


                            TRUE COPY
                                                   By Order,




                                                   Assistant Registrar,
                                                   ITAT, Delhi Benches




                                   3
4

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Organic SEO Outsourcing Organic Search Engine Optimization Outsourcing Organic Website SEO Organic SEO India Website SEO India Organic Search Engine Optimization India Organic Internet SEO India Organic Web

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions