sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 Assistant Commissioner Assessment Iv Trade Tax, Varanasi & Ors. Vs M/s Auto Centre
 Ansal Housing And Construction Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr.
 40 LPA-Opening Financial Controller
 30 LPA-Opening Senior Manager Finance & Accounts,
 Indus Best Hospitality & Realtors Pvt. Ltd vs. PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 ITO vs. Wiz-Tech Solutions Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Kolkata)
 Pesak Ventures Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 PCIT vs. Texraj Realty P.Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
 PCIT vs. Texraj Realty P.Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
 Ahmed Charaniya vs Jasmine Charaniya
  Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Saabri Freight Carrier Pvt Ltd

Winsome Laboratories Ltd.,C/o C-2/42, Janakpuri, New Delhi. VS. ITO, Ward-18 (3), New Delhi.
February, 12th 2013
                     (DELHI BENCH `H' NEW DELHI)


                         I.T.A. No.164/Del/2012
                       Assessment year : 2003-04

              Winsome Laboratories Ltd.,             ITO,
              C/o C-2/42, Janakpuri,                 Ward-18 (3),
              New Delhi.                       V.    New Delhi.

                  (Appellant)                  (Respondent)

                       PAN /GIR/No.AAACW 0771-D

                   Appellant by : None.
                   Respondent by : Shri Tarun Seem, Sr. DR.



This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of Ld CIT(A)
dated 31.10.2011.      The case was originally fixed for hearing on
14.3.2012 on which date the Bench did not function and hearing was
adjourned to 21.5.2012 on which date also the Bench did not function
and hearing was adjourned to 21.11.2012 and on which date Ld AR
appeared and case was fixed for today i.e. 11.2.2013. The date was
duly noted by the Ld AR but neither any application for adjournment
was filed nor any body appeared on behalf of the assessee. It appears
that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence
the appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be dismissed for non
prosecution. In our above view, we find support from the following
                                       2                    ITA No...../Del/

        1. In the case of CIT v. B.N. Bhattachargee & Another 118 ITR
        461 (relevant pages 477 & 478) wherein their Lordships have
        held that "The appeal does not mean merely filing of appeal but
        effectively of pursuing it."
        2. In the case of Estate of Late Tukoji Rao Holker v. CWT 223 IR
        480 (MP) while dismissing the reference made at the instance of
        assessee in default made following observations in their order:
        "if the party at whose instance the reference is made, fails to
        appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of
        the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, this
        court is not bound to answer the reference.
        3. In the case of CIT v. Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd. 38 ITD 320 (Del.)
        The appeal filed by the revenue before the Tribunal which was
        fixed for hearing but on the date of hearing nobody represented
        the revenue/applicant, nor any communication for adjournment
        was received. There was no communication or information as to
        why revenue choose to remain absent on that date. The Tribunal
        on the basis of inherent power treated the appeal filed by the
        revenue as un-admitted in view of Rule 19 of the Appellate
        Tribunal Rules, 1963.

Therefore, keeping in view the above, the appeal filed by the assessee
is dismissed for non prosecution.
3.      Order pronounced in the open court on 11th day of February,

     Sd/-                                                 Sd/-
 (A.D. JAIN)                                      (T.S. KAPOOR)
JUDICIAL MEMBER                               ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dt. 11.2.2013.
                                 3                 ITA No...../Del/

Copy forwarded to:-
   1. The appellant
   2. The respondent
   3. The CIT
   4. The CIT (A)-, New Delhi.
   5. The DR, ITAT, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi.
True copy.
                                                   By Order

                                                  (ITAT, New Delhi).

Date of hearing                             11.2.2013

Date of Dictation                           11.2.2013

Date of Typing                              11.2.2013

Date of order signed by                     11.2.2013
both the Members &

Date of order uploaded on net               11.2.2013
& sent to the Bench concerned.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Contact Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions