UT put on notice on VAT Tribunal appointments UT put on notice on VAT Tribunal appointments Chartered Accountant CA ICAI Chartered Accountants CA ICAI CAinINDIA ICAI Announcements Accounting Standards CA News ICAI Students ICAI Members Case Laws CPT IPCC Final ICAI Course CA Course ICAI Forum CA Question Papers ICAI Study Material

« VAT (Value Added Tax) »

Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
Gujarat slashes tax on ATF by 5 per cent
CENVAT Credit canâ€™t be denied If ISD invoices issued for distribution of ITC prior to Registration
1 step forward, 2 steps back. Is GST going the VAT way?
1 step forward, 2 steps back. Is GST going the VAT way?
Pending VAT comes to haunt companies claiming input tax credit
One-time settlement of VAT, excise disputes in the works
Haryana government uploads photos of VAT defaulters
Filing of online return for 4th quarter of 2017-18 extension of period thereof.
No Cenvat credit admissible on outward transportation services from factory to buyerâ€™s premises
Filing of reconciliation return in form 9 for the year 2016-17
Govt may send notice to 162 companies; ask for VAT returns


« Haryana govt exempts VAT on wheat...	No change in VAT rates for now... »
UT put on notice on VAT Tribunal appointments

February, 13th 2013
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Monday put the UT Chandigarh Administration on notice, while acting on a petition seeking appointment to the post of chairman and members of UT Chandigarh VAT Tribunal in consultation with the high court. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Arjan Kumar Sikri and Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain issued notices to UT Chandigarh and the advisor to the administrator for April 3. Lawyer H C Arora had filed the petition seeking issuance of directions to the respondents to make appointment to the post of chairman, at present occupied by the UT Advisor, and three posts of members of the UT Chandigarh VAT Tribunal only in consultation with the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The court was informed that the UT Chandigarh VAT Tribunal being a quasi-judicial tribunal and being under the superintendence of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the appointments to its posts of chairman and members could not be made by UT Administration, without consulting the Punjab and Haryana High Court.