Notice to Punjab on posts of VAT tribunal members Notice to Punjab on posts of VAT tribunal members Chartered Accountant CA ICAI Chartered Accountants CA ICAI CAinINDIA ICAI Announcements Accounting Standards CA News ICAI Students ICAI Members Case Laws CPT IPCC Final ICAI Course CA Course ICAI Forum CA Question Papers ICAI Study Material

« VAT (Value Added Tax) »

Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
Gujarat slashes tax on ATF by 5 per cent
CENVAT Credit canâ€™t be denied If ISD invoices issued for distribution of ITC prior to Registration
1 step forward, 2 steps back. Is GST going the VAT way?
1 step forward, 2 steps back. Is GST going the VAT way?
Pending VAT comes to haunt companies claiming input tax credit
One-time settlement of VAT, excise disputes in the works
Haryana government uploads photos of VAT defaulters
Filing of online return for 4th quarter of 2017-18 extension of period thereof.
No Cenvat credit admissible on outward transportation services from factory to buyerâ€™s premises
Filing of reconciliation return in form 9 for the year 2016-17
Govt may send notice to 162 companies; ask for VAT returns


« Transporters demand waiver on VAT, duty on diese...	No merger of local body tax with VAT, GST... »
Notice to Punjab on posts of VAT tribunal members

February, 08th 2013
Taking up a public interest litigation seeking directions for filling three posts of members in the Punjab Value-Added Tax (VAT) Tribunal here, the Punjab and Haryana high court has issued a notice of motion to the Punjab government. With the three posts lying vacant, the tribunal is being run only by justice Harbans Lal (retd) as its chairman. The petitioner, advocate HC Arora, informed the division bench comprising chief justice Arjan Kumar Sikri and justice Rakesh Kumar Jain that these vacancies should be filled only in consultation with the high court in view of the Supreme Court judgments in "SP Sampath Kumar vs Union of India" (1987) and "State of Gujarat and another vs Gujarat Revenue Tribunal Bar Association and another" (2012). The court was informed that till date the state government had been making appointments in the tribunal without the high court's consent. The case would now come up for hearing on April 3.