sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
Customs and Excise »
 Delhi Customs launches special drive to help exporters get quick tax refunds
  Customs Audit Regulations, 2018
 Customs Audit Regulations, 2018
 Central Board of Excise and Customs to be renamed CBIC by April
 Central Board Of Excise & Customs New Delhi GST Flyers
 Hike in customs duty on electronics likely to boost revenue collection
 Customs duty raised on electronic goods
 Ministry Of Finance (Central Board Of Direct Taxes) Notification
 Refund of IGST paid on export of goods under rule 96 of CGST Rules,2017
 Customs And Central Excise Drawback – Part II
 Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules 2007

Court stays operation of excise recovery of disputed amounts order
February, 11th 2013

While staying the January 1, 2013 order of the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) directing immediate recovery of tax dues where an assessee’s appeal against pre-deposit has not been heard within 30 days of the demand by the department, the Bombay High Court, however, gave liberty to the department to recover wherever the assessee’s stay application against pre-deposit of the disputed amount has been pending for more than a reasonable time due to his default.

The stay has been granted in response to an application made by Tata Steel, Larsen and Toubro among others.

The excise law requires pre-deposit of the disputed excise demand but arms the Tribunal with power to stay this requirement for full or part of the amount. The CBEC had issued the impugned order to its officers finding that the excise collections were dwindling. The Court’s stay of the order is only partial in the sense that it has left enough elbow room for the department where it finds the assessee guilty of dilly-dallying tactics though admittedly this could well introduce an element of uncertainty and lock the assessees and the department in disputes on this limited but significant issue — hether the hearing on the stay application against pre-deposit is becoming protracted due to the fault of the assessee.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Privacy Policy

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions