Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TDS :: due date for vat payment
 
 
VAT (Value Added Tax) »
 Petrol prices set to rise in Goa with increase in VAT
 Payment systems to remain open on all days from March 25, 2017 to April 1, 2017
 Delhi cuts VAT on ATF to 1% for regional flights; other states to announce the same soon a
 Shops cannot charge VAT on discounted items: Consumer forum
 Delhiites have to pay lowest taxes as AAP govt announces cuts on VAT on various items
 Tamil Nadu minister justifies VAT hike on fuel
 State Government urged to withdraw hike in VAT on petrol, diese
 High VAT may encourage illegal trading
 Delhi budget unlikely to have any new tax proposals this year
 Date for filing quarterly VAT returns extended
 Framing of Central Assessments - Dated 2-2-2017 - VAT - Delhi

Centre must compensate for CST cut: Sushil Modi
February, 13th 2012

The grouping of state finance ministers on Goods and Services Tax (GST) will meet in the capital on March 3, to discuss the Centre's refusal to compensate states for the loss of revenue on account of reduced central sales tax (CST).

The Centre has refused compensation in the current fiscal, even as it agreed to release 6,393.94 crore for 2010-11, following the gradual lowering of CST to 2% from 4%. According to some estimates, the reduction has caused a cumulative revenue loss of 19,000 crore annually to the states.

"We are trying to talk to the central government and arrive at an amicable solution so that the states get their due,'' Bihar finance minister Sushil Kumar Modi, who heads the Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers on GST, told ET on Sunday. "We are inching positively towards GST roll-out. Therefore, at this stage, if the government of India takes a unilateral decision, it will hamper the implementation of GST."

CST, Modi said, was reduced to 2% over three years ago. "Now the Centre has to compensate states for the loss in their revenue because of this reduction," he said. The Centre has asked all states to file their compensation claims for the previous fiscal on account of reduction in CST. It plans to do away with CST in phases to facilitate implementation of GST.

States have, however, taken objection to Centre's letter addressed to the committee chairman last month which said the compensation for 2010-11 may be considered the "final settlement." It also referred to guidelines worked out by Centre in consultation with states.

However, an official who did not wish to be named said the committee had never agreed to the payment of CST compensation for 2010-11 after deducting the amount of assumed revenue on account of the increase in the VAT rate from 4% to 5%. There were no guidelines which mentioned that any amount will be deducted after factoring in assumed revenue accruing to the states because of the increase in VAT rates, the official said.

The revised guidelines on the compensation package were worked out by the Centre and the states on August 22, 2008, the official added. These guidelines had not envisaged any further "non-monetary steps" by the states such as increasing VAT from 4% to 5%, or slapping of a tax on textile and sugar.

Moreover, several states such as West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Orissa did not raise VAT rate from 4% to 5% during 2010-11, and therefore, they were strongly opposed to deducting any amount from the compensation owed to them after assuming the revenue that they would have generated had they increased the VAT rate and deducting that amount from their compensation package.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions