Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court

Govt likely to challenge ITAT ruling on Bofors case
February, 07th 2011

The government is likely to challenge the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruling on Bofors case in the Delhi High Court for its remarks against the Income Tax department.

Though government was not a direct party in the case, based on the opinion of Attorney General Ghoolam Vahanvati, the Law Ministry is understood to have asked the Finance Ministry to challenge the ITAT ruling as it contained certain remarks against the Income Tax department.

The tribunal had said that commissions were paid to late Win Chaddha and Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi in the Bofors gun deal in the nineties.

"In our view, to enforce the rule of law, these steps were desirable to bring all the relevant income tax violations to the logical end by the income tax department. Inaction in this regard may lead to a non-existent undesirable and detrimental notion that India is a soft state and one can meddle with its tax laws with impunity," the tribunal had said in its 98-page order.

Vahanvati is learnt to have told the Law Ministry that the Income Tax department, which comes under the Finance Ministry, should challenge the ITAT order in the Delhi High Court for removal of the remarks by the tribunal against the Income Tax department in its December, 2010 order.

The appeal will be restricted to the strictures against the I-T department only. It will not touch upon the issue of any private person who had approached the tribunal on taxation matters.

The tribunal in a ruling on an appeal filed by Chaddha's son, Hersh W Chaddha had concluded the arms dealer had got Rs 52.6 crore as kickbacks and Quattrocchi got USD seven million (around Rs 13 crore).

In response to a reference from the Finance Ministry, the AG is learnt to have stated the tribunal had overstepped its jurisdiction.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting