Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: form 3cd :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT Audit :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
 
 
General »
 While filing tax in India, NRIs do not have to report overseas assets
  Clarification regarding applicability of Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act. 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act. 1956 -reg.
 SH. VISHWA NATH GUPTA Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL, KANPUR AND ANR.
 No tax scrutiny of big transaction if it matches income
 Clarification regarding applicability of Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act. 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act. 1956 -reg.
  Home loan tax reliefs often missed by taxpayers
 Income tax department launches online facility for linking Aadhaar and PAN
 Home loan tax reliefs often missed by taxpayers
 Tax headache in India is a bonanza for global accounting firms
 Activities To Be Treated As Supply Even If Made Without Consideration Under CGST ACT
  Haryana Goods and Services Tax Bill passed

Tax breaks on short-term insurance policies may go
February, 16th 2010

The Union Budget may remove tax breaks on short-term insurance policies which provide more of investment and less of protection. At present, there is no linkage between tax breaks and the tenure of life insurance products.

The Direct Tax Code has proposed that to be eligible for tax breaks, the premium under a life policy should not be more than 5% of the sum insured and the policy tenure should be for at least 20 years. While there are indications that such severe conditions may not be imposed on life companies, it is likely that the government may ask for a higher component of insurance and a minimum tenure.

In the past, the Budget had removed tax breaks on insurance policies that mimic single premium bonds by introducing amendments to Section 10(10)D of the Income Tax Act, which excluded tax breaks on any policy where the sum insured was less than five times the premium.

The restriction on short-term policies may come through a similar amendment. While life insurers have learned to live with restrictions on short-term policies, they have been lobbying for creation of a separate category of tax-breaks for long-term investments.

Currently, all investments, including life insurance, provident fund, mutual funds, bank deposits, are clubbed together under Section 80(C) where tax relief is provided for investments up to Rs 1 lakh.

The availability of short-term tax saving instruments discourages people from investing money into long-term investments like life insurance and pensions, said SB Mathur, chief executive of Life Insurance Council.

There is, therefore, an urgent need to have a separate block for savings of long-term nature like life insurance, pensions and investment of more than, say, 10 years or those with a minimum lock-in period of five years. These savings are critical to meet the huge demand for investment in infrastructure if the economy is to grow at a rate of 9% or more in future.

Life insurers have also made representations to the government asking it to give companies more time to carry forward their losses. At present, companies are allowed to carry forward losses for eight years for the purpose of avoiding tax. Life companies have sought more time on the ground that the life insurance industry has a long gestation period and it takes a minimum of 8-10 years to break even.

Even when the break-even point is reached, profits in the earlier years are low and not enough to wipe-off losses accumulated in the first 10 years of operation. Hence, the period of eight years for carry forward of losses is not enough, said Mr Mathur.

Furthermore, life insurers are seeking a level-playing field with mutual funds as far as imposition of service tax is concerned. Current regulations require that life companies pay service tax on that portion of the premium which is collected from the policyholder but is not credited to his ULIP account.

A fallout from this is that the service tax is collected even on the stamp duty which is not a service fee but revenue collected on behalf of the government.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Quality Assurance Services Testing and Re-testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions