Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: TDS :: empanelment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
« From the Courts »
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)
 M. G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Haryana State Road & Bridges Development Corporation Ltd vs. CIT (P&H High Court)
 Dharamshibhai Sonani vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Govt challenges ITAT order
February, 25th 2010

The government on Wednesday approached the Delhi high court challenging an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that gave relief to mobile phone maker giant Nokia in a case of alleged tax evasion.

A division bench comprising justice BD Ahmed and justice Siddharth Mridul admitted the petition filed by the income tax department and posted the matter to 12 April for next hearing.

In its petition, the IT department said the ITAT has wrongly deleted the penalty imposed by it on Nokia India for allegedly wrongly declaring its income.

It further said assessee (Nokia) knowingly furnished inaccurate particulars of its income and has concealed the facts relating to computation of its correct income for the year under consideration.

The IT department had imposed a penalty of Rs1.14 crore on Nokia on 27 March 2006, for allegedly furnishing wrong returns for the financial year 2001-02.

According to IT department, Nokia had claimed nil tax on some aspects such as allowances on foreign travel, account provision of warranty, marketing expenses etc.

Later, in March 2004, the department picked up Nokias income tax return for scrutiny and sent a notice after finding alleged irregularities.

After scrutiny, IT department assessed Nokias income at Rs12 crore and imposed a fine of Rs1.4 crore and equal amount of tax for alleged evasion of tax by the firm.

This was challenged by Nokia before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which deleted the penalty provision.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Customer relationship management software CRM software Operational CRM Collaborative CRM

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions