Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India
 
 
« General »
  Clarification regarding applicability of Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act. 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act. 1956 -reg.
 SH. VISHWA NATH GUPTA Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL, KANPUR AND ANR.
 No tax scrutiny of big transaction if it matches income
 Clarification regarding applicability of Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act. 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act. 1956 -reg.
  Home loan tax reliefs often missed by taxpayers
 Income tax department launches online facility for linking Aadhaar and PAN
 Home loan tax reliefs often missed by taxpayers
 Tax headache in India is a bonanza for global accounting firms
 Activities To Be Treated As Supply Even If Made Without Consideration Under CGST ACT
  Haryana Goods and Services Tax Bill passed
 Maharashtra to focus on rise in non-tax income

Decide on taxing expenditure on dividends
February, 03rd 2010

The Bombay High Court has recently admitted a writ petition that challenges an Income-Tax rule allowing the taxation of expenditure incurred on earning tax-free income like dividends and long-term capital gains. The writ petition was filed by Technocraft Industries India, a Mumbai-based exporter, along with Indian Exporters Grievance Forum, a body under the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO). The final hearing of the matter is slated for February 15.

The specific rule challenged in the court, according to the petitioners, stipulates a stringent structure for taxing expenditure related to earning income that is exempt from taxation.

This rule Rule 8 D of section 14 A of the Income-Tax Act also authorises an assessing officer to use a formula for computing expenditure incurred on earning the tax-free income if he is not satisfied with the declaration of the taxpayer. Section 14 A provides for taxing the expenditure related to earning the income thats exempt from taxation.

The petitioner stated that at times the rule leads to situations in which a disproportionately huge expenditure incurred on earning a small income was brought into the tax net. In the process, the benefit derived by the taxpayer by earning income which is exempt from taxation is substantially reduced and even leads to double taxation.

Elaborating its stand, the petitioner said when it had earned tax exempt dividend from surplus not borrowed funds and which did not form part of the total income, the assessing officer (AO) could not consider the value of those investments on which no tax-exempt dividend was earned. For instance, the AO could not consider as expenditure the interest that the company paid on loans taken for purposes other than earning tax-free dividend.

Rule 8 D is not a procedural provision but a substantive provision on parity with a charging section as it disallows expenditure whose tax effect may be much more than the tax on the dividend as explained above, stated the petitioner.

The petitioners forum represented by Pankaj R Toprani, stated in the writ petition that Rule 8 is against the basic principle of taxation which allows levy of tax calculated as gross income minus expenditure. This specific rule is tantamount to double taxation, the petitioner contended.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Portfolio

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions