Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: form 3cd
 
 
« News Headlines »
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful
 Your deposit may draw income tax notice
 Accepting payment under IDS 2016
 New disclosure scheme could see 50% tax and 4-year limit on cash use for unaccounted deposits
 Pay 50% tax on unaccounted deposits, or 85% if caught, says Modi government
 Deadline to pay property tax in old currency extended
 Cabinet clears amendments to Income Tax Act
 Have you got interest on your income tax refund?

Bombay HC bench to hear Vodafones plea against income-tax department
February, 09th 2008
Vodafones writ petition, challenging the show-cause notice issued by the income-tax department, will be heard by the Bombay High Court on February 10.

If the division bench decides that the writ is maintainable, it will admit the petition and hear the arguments further for deciding the case. Vodafone International Holdings BV (VIHBV) has challenged the income-tax departments show-cause notice demanding tax on the $11-billion takeover of the Indian telecom major Hutch-Essar.

The division bench comprising Justices FI Rebello and RS Mohite held that the question of maintainability of the petition is kept open for consideration at the time of final hearing. The high court has listed the status of the case as one at the stage of pre-admission. However, in the event the high court decides that the writ is not maintainable, the income-tax department is free to make a demand on Vodafone. According to the department, Vodafone should have withheld the tax that can run up to $2 billion, before it paid to Hutchison Hong Kong for buying stakes in Hutchison-Essar.

Even when the IT department issues an order against Vodafone, the latter is not obliged to make the payment immediately. Vodafone still can appeal before the commissioner (appeal), the first appellate body on tax matters, against the IT demand, and also seek a stay for payment of tax until commissioner (appeal) decides on the case. In the event of the appeal for stay on payment of tax is rejected by the assessing officer, Vodafone can appeal before the additional director of income tax and later the director of income tax, if necessary. For both the parties, it is going to be long battle. If the commissioner (appeal) decides against Vodafone, the latter can go to the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal.

The issue between the Indian IT authorities and Vodafone has been curiously watched by the international tax community as this case can turn out to be a benchmark for deciding similar cases in other countries. This case has been prominently reported in most international tax journals, websites etc. Vodafone has filed the writ petition to challenge the Indian revenues claim that the company was in default of withholding tax obligations in India.

Vodafones point of view was this: The sale of shares of Hutch-Essar by Hong Kong-based Hutchison International to the Netherlands-based holding company of Vodafone was a transaction that took place outside India and the Indian tax authorities have no locus standi on the deal.

The Indian tax authorities viewed the issue as follows: The profit made by Hutchison Hong Kong while it sold its shares of Hutch-Essar to Vodafone was generated in India. Therefore, Vodafone, the buyer of the shares, had an obligation to pay the withholding tax in India, before making the payment to Hutchison.
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Sitemap

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions