Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TDS :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
« News Headlines »
 Is government tapping your phone?
 Income tax department to use analytics to look for discrepancies in bank accounts
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful
 Your deposit may draw income tax notice
 Accepting payment under IDS 2016
 New disclosure scheme could see 50% tax and 4-year limit on cash use for unaccounted deposits
 Pay 50% tax on unaccounted deposits, or 85% if caught, says Modi government

Taxman seeks clarity on foreign entities
February, 16th 2007
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has sought a clear definition of the term permanent establishment for assessment of tax payable by foreign entities in India. Currently, the Act defines a permanent establishment as a fixed place of business. 
 
According to sources in the tax department, the new definition may be included after amending the Income Tax Act, 1961. 
 
The CBDT is concerned that a lack of clear definition to permanent establishment has elicited legal wrangle related to international tax matters and transfer pricing and that a new definition should be compatible with that in double tax avoidance agreements. 
 
Sources said the double tax avoidance pacts definition with the US was comprehensive. 
 
For, apart from including establishments like a place of management, branch, factory, workshop, mine, oil or gas, quarry, and others, the pact incorporated sales outlets, installations or structures used for exploration of natural resources, building sites, assembly project on the condition that such places should have had use for more than 120 days. 
 
The forthcoming Budget may also address the definition of India for I-T purposes. At present, the territorial jurisdiction of India is restricted to the entire country within its borders, stretching 12 nautical miles to the sea. 
 
The board argues that a new definition is needed to tackle cases like the undersea optical fibre cables laid by telecom companies for international locations. It prefers an all inclusive definition in which India is defined as the territory of India and includes territorial sea, airspace above it as well as maritime zone in which India has sovereign rights, other rights and jurisdiction. 
 
The issue came to the fore after the recent Mumbai Appellate Tribunals order in the case of Dresdner Bank. According to the order, the Indian establishment of a foreign company is to be treated hypothetically, independent of its head office, with regard to the taxation of foreign companies operating in India. 
 
This is the underlying principle in transfer pricing as well. Experts feel the amendments in tax laws vis--vis taxation of non-residents have also not kept pace with globalisation of businesses. 
 
Another controversy relating to permanent establishment has been the recent directive of the Supreme Court where the tax liability on multinational firms has been waived off for payments received by the Indian counterpart for offshore supply of equipment and materials. The company in this case was Ishikawajma-Harima Heavy Industries Ltd from Japan. 
 
The Supreme Court order is in direct contrast to the Advance Ruling Authority that ruled that the foreign company has to pay taxes to Indian authorities since the source of income is arising from the Indian company, even if the payment is made for offshore projects. 
 
This has far reaching implications on international taxation, especially in turnkey projects handled by Indian companies with the help of foreign suppliers and contractors.
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Outsourcing Company Offshore Software Outsourcing Software Outsourcing Company India Offshore Outsourcing Company India Software BPO Software Business Process Outsourcing Software Outsourcing India Offsho

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions