Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: cpt :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit
 
 
News Headlines »
 Directions under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 Securities excluded from GST ambit in revised Bill
 GST dilemma: Hope fades for new tax regime
 5nance.com launches tax investment platform
 Is government tapping your phone?
 Income tax department to use analytics to look for discrepancies in bank accounts
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful

Not the way to bond with taxpayers
February, 10th 2007

The CBDT (Central Board of Direct Taxes) Notification 380 of December 22, 2006, not only pulls the rug from under the feet of those who have earned substantial capital gains but also gives an unpalatable foretaste of things to come.

Through this Notification it has been made clear that one is entitled to invest in Section 54EC bonds issued by the NHAI and REC only to the maximum extent of Rs 50 lakh during the previous year 2006-2007, whereas Section 54EC sets no such limit much less delegate powers to the CBDT to fix one. What this portends is if one has earned long-term capital gain in excess of Rs 50 lakh and is not inclined or entitled to invest in the other tax shelters, he has to willy-nilly pay tax on such gains in excess of Rs 50 lakh at 20 per cent plus surcharge, if applicable, and the education cess.

And there is no guarantee that he would be allotted the coveted bonds because they are no longer on tap, what with the REC bond which is on sale from December 26, 2006 till March 31, 2007, having a cap of Rs 3,500 crore just as the NHAI bond which preceded it had a cap, though of a slightly higher amount.

Pulling the plug

Those unable to invest in the specified bonds within the prescribed time for no fault of theirs but due to the abrupt pulling of plug by the CBDT would most certainly feel cheated and seek judicial redress. But what of the Notification, which is clearly without the authority of the law because Section 54EC has not delegated any such powers nor has it put any cap on the investment one can make in the bonds?

If Parliament feels that Section 54EC has opened the floodgates of legitimate tax avoidance, if one may say so, it can by all means scrap it prospectively because retrospective withdrawal of a tax benefit, besides being innately unfair, is frowned upon by the judiciary. In fact, both the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister have gone on record these last few months hinting at withdrawal of tax exemptions, which is fine so long as it is done prospectively. To be sure, there is every justification for dismantling the Section 54EC regime in particular as it is the easiest way to avoid tax legitimately just park your funds emanating out of long-term capital gains for three years in the specified bonds and you are spared from tax liability on the amount thus invested.

The three-year lock-in period is admittedly too short, which naturally has people falling over themselves to lap up the scheme. But it is one thing to withdraw a benefit after putting the taxpayers on notice but quite another to wrench it away having led them up the garden path.

S. Murlidharan
(The author is a Delhi-based chartered accountant.)

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - About Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions