Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment
 
 
News Headlines »
 Securities excluded from GST ambit in revised Bill
 GST dilemma: Hope fades for new tax regime
 5nance.com launches tax investment platform
 Is government tapping your phone?
 Income tax department to use analytics to look for discrepancies in bank accounts
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful
 Your deposit may draw income tax notice

Infrastructure firm's depreciation claims get a leg-up
February, 16th 2007

In a verdict that would aid infrastructure companies in claiming depreciation allowance, an Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a company is entitled to depreciation claims if it genuinely owned and operated the property. In short, the ITAT held that if a transaction is genuine, it should get the respective tax benefit. The order was in an appeal filed by Tata Power.

In this case, the deal was registered towards the close of the financial year prompting taxmen to conclude that the power plant purchase was only with the intention of claiming undue depreciation.

However, the ITAT after verifying the facts, decided that the transaction was genuine, and hence the company is entitled to the tax benefit accorded to infrastructure projects. Depreciation allowance in power plant is spread as follows: 80% of the value is exempt in the first year, 80% of the remaining 20% in the following year, and again 80% of the remaining 4% the next year. In this case, Tata Power won the claim of depreciation allowance of Rs 59.65 crore, arising from the use of power plant bought by it from Tata Steel.

Tata Power paid Rs 300 crore for the plant, but the claim of depreciation was disallowed by the I-T department on the ground that the deed of the purchase was registered on March 29, 1997, just before the close of the financial year, and hence there was enough ground to conclude that it was a make believe deal to claim depreciation allowance.

Senior tax lawyer Dinesh Vyas, counsel for Tata Power, argued that the power plant, originally belonging to Tata Steel, was eventually transferred to Tata Power, on account of the latters expertise in running such plants and the paper work regarding completing towards the closure of the financial year was incidental. The plant had become operational from January 22, 1997 and under a MoU executed between the two companies on January 30, 1996. The plant was operated by Tata Power from January 22, 1997.

The MoU was also subject to the approval by Bihar State Government. The Tribunal held that the documentation of transfer of title, which was completed just before the closure of the financial year, is to be treated as a matter of technicality.

The crucial factor that has to be taken into consideration is whether the company has used the asset for the purpose of its business, exercising its power as the owner of the asset. If the assessee has used the asset as its own property entitled to all benefits and answerable to all liabilities and has exclusive rights over the property against the entire world, the claim of depreciation must be allowed even if certain technical aspect of conveyance deed, etc may be pending at the close of the relevant previous year, the ITAT observed.

It held that where the conveyance deed is lawfully executed, its validity can go back to the date of de facto transfer of ownership of the asset.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System developers CMS developers Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions CMS India Content Management System India CMS development India Website CMS Website Content Management India Portal CMS India CMS Outsourcing CMS Vendor Complete CMS Custom CMS Services

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions