Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

Smt. Asha Ahuja, 1613, Sector-13, Hisar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Hisar
January, 04th 2019
                IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                      DELHI BENCH: `E', NEW DELHI

              BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                                 AND
                SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                              ITA No.2223/Del/2016
                             Assessment Year: 2011-12

Smt. Asha Ahuja,                         Vs.   Income Tax Officer,
1613, Sector-13, Hisar                         Ward-1, Hisar
PAN :ACKPA6723G
           (Appellant)                                   (Respondent)


                Assessee by            Sh. Nippun Mittal, CA
                Department by          Ms. Rinku singh, Sr.DR

                                 Date of hearing                02.01.2019
                                 Date of pronouncement          03.01.2019


                                       ORDER


PER DIVA SINGH, J.M.:

      The present appeal has been filed by the assessee assailing the
correctness of the order dated 11.01.2016 of CIT(A), Hissar, pertaining to the
AY: 2011-12, wherein an adjournment application has been moved seeking
time on the grounds that the counsel is out of station.
2.    Ms. Rinku Singh, Sr. DR., appearing for the Revenue objected to the
grant of time stating that in the present appeal, no grounds have been filed
by the assessee. Position was ascertained from both the sets available with
the Bench wherein also copy of grounds was found to be missing. It was also
brought to the notice of the proxy counsel that various defects pointed out
by the Registry on 9th May, 2016 remained uncured wherein even the
following defect has also not been cured till date:
     "16. Form No. 36 alongwith grounds of appeals and verification is
     not filed in triplicate."
2 ITA No.2223/Del/2016 3. In these circumstances, the adjournment request was rejected as it appears that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the appeal filed as the appeal has been filed without the grounds. Despite issue of notices for removal of defect, no attempt has been made to cure the defect. Proxy counsel, Sh. Nippun Mittal, CA, could not make any submission on the said issue. 4. Considering the facts of the case and keeping in view the provisions of Rule 19(2) of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 as were considered in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India Ltd., (38 ITD 320)(Del), the assessee's appeal is liable to be dismissed. 7. Respectfully following the view taken in the case cited supra, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee. Before parting, we add that in case the assessee is serious in pursuing the appeal filed, then she would be at liberty to pray for a recall of this order by moving an appropriate petition and also by taking appropriate action to correct the defect pointed out by the Registry. The Co-ordinate Bench considering the petition, if so satisfied with the explanation and the actions of curing the defects, may recall this order. 8. In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as defective. Said order is pronounced in the open court on 3rd January, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (R.K. PANDA) (DIVA SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 3rd January, 2019. RK/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting