Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: VAT Audit :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
« Indirect Tax »
 How it affects long-term capital gains tax calculations
 Should you opt for 'consultant' status to lower tax outgo?
 Income Tax department to issue ‘non-statutory’ letters in case of no reply
 E-commerce majors seek removal of tax at source on sellers
 New direct tax regime would benefit state
 Indirect tax collections increase by 16.9 per cent in January
 Tax officers to file self-appraisal report on e-assessment
 How are you saving tax this season? 10 funds saved tax & delivered 30% returns too
 Increase in taxpayer base will help bring down tax rate, says Arun Jaitley
 There is inconsistency in filing income tax, says CBDT Chairman
 Data analytics to help income tax dept catch evaders

Way ahead is to reform indirect tax regime with GST
January, 22nd 2016

The Centre needs to follow through with pending legislation for the goods and services tax (GST). As the recent Arvind Subramanian expert committee points out, the lack of reforms in the indirect tax regime leads to high costs and inefficiencies in myriad ways. For instance, blocked input taxes or distorting tax-on-tax and cascading rates could add up to as much as three-fourths of investment in plant and machinery.

Hence the pressing need to change over from the dual value-added tax (VAT) system in the Centre and the states to an integrated GST, with tax levied only on the value added and input tax credits seamlessly available across the value chain. It would shore up transparency and boost tax efficiency.

For starters, the government needs to respond to the three main points raised by the Congress: one, that a standard GST rate of no more than 18% be part of the constitutional amendment; two, an independent dispute-settlement mechanism be in place; three, that the additional 1% interstate tax be dropped. It is notable that the Subramanian panel does make a strong case for doing away with the 1% tax, but only as a small footnote in very fine print.

The panel estimates the revenue-neutral rate for GST to be 15-15.5%, with “a strong preference for the lower end of the range”. But the report flags other risks, like revenue shortfall, lower growth and even that the methodology of estimating the standard GST rate can be prone to error. The panel has called for a standard rate and a lower rate for merit goods of mass consumption, plus a still-lower rate for precious commodities like gold.

In addition, it has called for higher taxes of up to 40% on luxury cars and petroleum products, and similar ‘sin taxes’ on tobacco and potable alcohol. It is also notable that the committee backs tax on hitherto exempt heads like education and health.

The report is also explicit in recommending that exemption on excise duty and the like be done away with. Such exemptions amount to negative protection against import competition, as input tax credit cannot be claimed. It makes perfect sense to widen the indirect tax base by including most goods and services, and to keep the rates low. Indirect taxes are by definition regressive, paid by all and sundry. We need to keep them moderate to encourage compliance and raise tax buoyancy going forward.

The report mentions that no input tax credits are allowed for the Union excise duties on capital equipment acquired for use in such vital sectors such as transportation, infrastructure or construction. And the reason for the glaring anomaly is that these sectors are perceived to be outside the scope of manufacturing. The report adds that in 2014-15, of the total investment in plant and equipment by the non-government, non-household sector of about Rs 7.4 lakh crore, “blocked input taxes could amount to as much as 75% of total investment”.

The fact of the matter is that we still have a high-cost tax structure thanks to cascading rates and tax-on-tax. The way ahead is to reform the indirect tax regime with GST. A standard GST rate at 16% makes eminent sense. Also, a lower rate of 12% (6% each for the Centre and states) for select goods of mass consumption may be considered. And precious metals can be levied 4% (2% + 2%).

As the report points out, the GST Bill does provide a 2% band for the states above the standard GST rate, for tax flexibility. But varying rates can distort and divert economic activity. The GST Council needs to work at uniform rates so as to have a truly national market. It also needs to decide on a date for including key petro-products in the GST regime.

Such items do provide disproportionately high tax revenue for both the Centre and the states. But given the polluting externalities of petro-goods, along with the standard GST rate, a top-up non-Vatable rate of, say, 24% would make sense. A similar rate structure can be envisaged for potable alcohol and tobacco. In due course, it would also make sense to include electricity duty and real estate in GST.

As for the issues flagged by the Congress, a rigid GST rate in the constitutional amendment is unwarranted. It also makes sense for the political executive to resolve tax issues via consensus and, if need be, by setting up an expert committee. With regard to doing away with the 2% central sales tax, it would make better sense to reduce it by 1% now and bring it to zero in, say, two years, as the Centre compensates the states for revenue shortfall, if any, for five years.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Multi-level Marketing MLM India Affiliate Marketing Affiliate Marketing Software MLM Software MLM Solutions Multi level marketing solutions MLM Servi

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions