Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: empanelment :: cpt :: TDS
« From the Courts »
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)
 M. G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Haryana State Road & Bridges Development Corporation Ltd vs. CIT (P&H High Court)
 Dharamshibhai Sonani vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Public Health Guard-India Trust,Bk No. A-54, R. No. 323,Ground Floor, Nr. Bank of Baroda, Ulhasnagar-421 001 Vs. The CIT-III, Room No. 7,A-Wing, 6th Floor, Ashar, I.T. Park Road ,Wagle Industrial Estate, Thane-400 604
January, 30th 2015
                  ,  Û `'  


  [^ ] , Û    Û]   ãá,    ¢



               ./I.T.A. No. 1956/Mum/2013
            ( [ [ / Assessment Year :2010-11
Public Health Guard-India / The CIT-III,     Room No. 7,
Trust,Bk No. A-54,             A-Wing, 6 t h Floor, Ashar,
 R. No. 323,Ground Floor,      I.T. Park Road ,
Nr. Bank of Baroda,            Wagle Industrial Estate,
Ulhasnagar-421 001             Thane-400 604
    . /   . / PAN/GIR No. : AAATP 5020D
     ( /Appellant)        ..       (× / Respondent)
        / Appellant by:                      Shri M. Subramaniam

      ×   /Respondent by:                   Shri Ms. Parminder Kaur

               / Date of Hearing                            :29.01.2015
               /Date of Pronouncement :29.01.2015

                               / O R D E R


        This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the
Ld. CIT-III, Thane dt. 29.11.2012 pertaining to assessment year 2010-11.

2.      The sole grievance of the assessee is that the CIT erred in law as
well as on fact in not granting exemption u/s. 80G of the Act.

3.      At the very outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that the
assessee was not given a reasonable opportunity to present its case as no
                                       2                     ITA No. 1956/M/2013

proper notice was served upon the assessee. To substantiate, the assessee
has filed an affidavit before us stating that it did not receive the letter dt.
28.9.2012 requiring the trust to attend on 29.10.2012 and further the trust
received the letter dt. 29.10.2012 requiring the attendance on 31.10.2012
only on 16.11.2012. It is the say of the Ld. Counsel that since no proper
opportunity was given to the assessee, the assessee could not substantiate
its claim for the renewal of exemption u/s.80G of the Act.

4.    Per contra, Ld. Departmental Representative pointed out that the
CIT in his order has clearly mentioned the service of notice and the
opportunities given to the assessee.

5.    Having heard the rival submissions, we have carefully perused the
order of the CIT and the contents of the affidavit filed by the assessee. In
our considered opinion, the assessee must get one more opportunity to
present its case. We, therefore, restore the matter to the file of the CIT-
III, Thane. The CIT is directed to decide the issue afresh after giving
reasonable and fair opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

6.    In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for
statistical purpose.

      Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing on 29th
January, 2015

                Sd/-                                       Sd/-
     (JOGINDER SINGH )                            (N.K. BILLAIYA)
 Mumbai;  Dated : 29th January, 2015

.../ RJ , Sr. PS
                           3       ITA No. 1956/M/2013

    /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.   × / The Respondent.
3.    () / The CIT(A)-
4.     / CIT
5.    ,   , 
     / DR, ITAT, Mumbai
6.   [  / Guard file.
                                / BY ORDER,
          ×  //True Copy//
                    (Dy./Asstt. Registrar)
                    ,  / ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Organic SEO Outsourcing Organic Search Engine Optimization Outsourcing Organic Website SEO Organic SEO India Website SEO India Organic Search Engine Optimization India Organic Internet SEO India Organic Web

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions