Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: cpt :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
From the Courts »
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21

M/s Orion Mad Pictures, 201, Kewal Industrial Estate,Senapati Bapat Marg,Lower Parel (W),Mumbai-400013 Vs. Income Tax Officer 11(1)(1), Circle 11(1), Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai-400020.
January, 19th 2015
                    ,                  ""          
      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "C" BENCH, MUMBAI

BEFORE HON'BLE S/SHRI H.L. KARWA, PRESIDENT AND B.R.BASKARAN (AM)
         .. ,                            .. ,   
                    ./I.T.A. No.684/Mum/2011
                 (   / Assessment Year :2007-08)

  M/s Orion Mad Pictures,          /       Income Tax Officer 11(1)(1),
  201, Kewal Industrial Estate,    Vs.     Circle 11(1), Aayakar Bhavan,
  Senapati Bapat Marg,                     Mumbai-400020.
  Lower Parel (W),
  Mumbai-400013
           ( /Appellant)           ..      (    / Respondent)


                  . /   . / PAN/GIRNo. :AABFO3367M

              / Appellant by            : Shri K Gopal
                /Respondent by            Shri Premanad J


                / Date of Hearing
                                                 : 1.1.2015
               /Date of Pronouncement : 16.01.2015


                                / O R D E R

 Per B.R.BASKARAN, Accountant Member:

       The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated
 1.11.2010 passed by Ld CIT(A)-3, Mumbai and it relates to the assessment
 year 2007-08. The assessee is contesting following additions through the
 original grounds of appeal, additional grounds and revised grounds of
 appeal.
       (a)     Addition made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act ­ Rs.19,00,316/-
       (b)    Disallowance of interest expenditure





 2.   We have heard the parties and perused the record. The assessee is a
 partnership firm engaged in the business of production and distribution of
                                     2                     I T A N o . 6 8 4 / Mu m / 2 0 1 1




motion pictures.   The first issue relates to the disallowance made u/s
40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessing officer has noticed that the assessee
did not deduct tax at source u/s 194I of the Act in respect of hiring of
plant, machinery, equipment, furniture and fittings, even though the
assessee had deducted tax at source at a lower rate u/s 194J of the Act.
Since there was short deduction of tax at source, the AO disallowed a sum
of Rs.28,12,412/- u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. In the appellate proceedings,
the Ld CIT(A) confirmed the action of the AO in principle. However, he
noticed that certain payments have been made to Individuals and the TDS
rate applicable on such payments u/s 194I was lower than that applicable
to non-individuals.    Accordingly he directed the AO to work the
disallowance afresh.


3.    Before us, the Ld A.R submitted that the short deduction of tax due
to application of wrong provisions of TDS will not attract disallowance u/s
40(a)(ia) of the Act. In this regard, he placed reliance on the decision of
Hon'ble Calcutta High Court rendered in the case of CIT Vs. S.K. Tekriwal
(361 ITR 432), wherein it was held that the short deduction of tax at
source will not attract disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Respectfully
following the above said decision, we set aside the order of Ld CIT(A) on
this issue and direct the AO to delete the disallowance.

4.    The next issue relates to the disallowance out of interest
expenditure claimed by the assessee. The Ld A.R submitted that the
assessing officer has disallowed part of interest expenditure on the
reasoning that the partners have withdrawn interest bearing funds for
personal purposes. He submitted that the Ld CIT(A) also confirmed the
same. The Ld A.R submitted that the assessee has received interest free
advances from the distributors and the said funds were only withdrawn by
the partners. In this regard, he invited our attention to pages 60 & 61 of
                                    3                     I T A N o . 6 8 4 / Mu m / 2 0 1 1




the paper book and submitted that the assessee has made one to one link.
He submitted that the Ld CIT(A) has not considered those statements.




5.    We also heard Ld D.R on this issue. According to the assessee, the
partners have withdrawn only interest free funds and according to the
assessee, the said fact has been established by preparing a statement,
which is placed at pages 60-61 of the paper book filed by the assessee.
Admittedly, the tax authorities have not considered the said contentions of
the assessee.    Accordingly, we are of the view that this issue requires
fresh examination at the end of the assessing officer. Accordingly, we set
aside the order of Ld CIT(A) and direct the AO to reconsider this matter
afresh by duly considering the contentions of the assessee and also the
information and explanations that may be furnished by the assessee and
take appropriate decision in accordance with the law.

6.    In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed
for statistical purposes.

      The above order was pronounced in the open court on 16th
Jan,2015.

            16th Jan 2015    

       sd                                       sd


(.. / H.L. KARWA)                        (..  ,/ B.R. BASKARAN)
  / PRESIDENT                              /Accountant Member
  Mumbai:16th Jan, 2015.


. ../ SRL , Sr. PS
                            4                 I T A N o . 6 8 4 / Mu m / 2 0 1 1




        /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.  / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.      ,     ,                   /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.


                                              / BY ORDER,

                                        (Asstt. Registrar)
                              ,  /ITAT, Mumbai

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Website Ranking Website Ranking Company Website Positioning Alexa Ranking Website Promotion Website top 10 ranking website top 10 promotion search engine result promotion Strategic Internet Marketing Website Optimization Website Ranking Factors

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions