sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 DCIT Circle 2(1) Gurgaon vs Kellog Brown & Roof Engineering & Construction India Pvt. Ltd. 16th Floor, Tower-A, DLF Building, Nos. 5, DLF Cyber Terraces, DLF Phase-III, Gurgaon
 Dharam Pal, Garg R Kumar & Associates, 7, Adv. Chambers, RDC, Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad vs ITO, Ward-1(2), Ghaziabad
 Satish Singhal, 6, Patpar Road, Shivpuri, New Delhi vs ITO, Ward-11(1), New Delhi
 Vodafone Mobile Services Limited vs. Commissioner Of Service Tax, Delhi
 Anupam Sushil Garg, S/o Shri Vijay Garg, C/o Venus Cinema, Railway Road, Saharanpur. vs. Income-tax Officer, Ward-2, Saharanpur.
 Oriental Building & Furnishing Co.Ltd. C/o. Ravi Gupta, Advocate E-6A, Kailash Colony New Delhi vs. DCIT Circle-13(1) New Delhi.a
 Housing Board Haryana, Panchkula, Haryana
 Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited, Multi Location, Multi State
 Ranjana Sen Gupta Raghavan, H-1592, Chittaranjan Park, New Delhi-110019 vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-71(2), New Delhi
 M/s Sony India Private Limited A-31 , Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate New Delhi -44 vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income tax , Circle 24 (1), New Delhi
 Manik Singh S/o. Dr. Meharban Singh, A-47, Sector-31, Noida Uttar Pradesh Noida vs. DCIT Room No. 408, 4th Floor, A- 2D, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector-24 Noida

M/s. HFCL Satellite Communications Ltd. 8, Commercial Complex, Masjid Moth, Greater Kailash Part-II, New Delhi 110 048. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, New Delhi
January, 07th 2015
                     IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                         DELHI BENCHES : "C" NEW DELHI


             BEFORE SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                   AND SHRI A.T. VARKEY , JUDICIAL MEMBER


                                 ITA Nos. 3162,3163/Del/2013
                                  Asstt. Years 2003-04, 2005-06

       M/s. HFCL Satellite Communications Ltd.     vs. Deputy Commissioner of
       8, Commercial Complex, Masjid Moth,            Income Tax, Central Circle-1,
       Greater Kailash Part-II,                        New Delhi
       New Delhi ­ 110 048.
        (PAN AAACH2447K)
              (Appellant)                                    (Respondent)


                        Appellant by   :Shri M.P. Rastogi, Advocate
                        Respondent     :Shri Satpal Singh, Sr. DR


                              ORDER

PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER



       This is an appeal filed by the Ld. CIT (A) ­X dated 12.3.2013 for the

assessment year 2003-04.


2.     We have heard Shri M.P. Rastogi, Ld. Counsel for the assesee and Shri Satpal

Singh, Ld. SR. DR.


3.      On a careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and a

perusal of the papers on record and the orders of the authorities below, we hold as

follows :-







3.1.    The assesee in this case has demonstrated that it was prevented sufficient

cause from appearing before the first appellate authority.
                                                            ITA. Nos.3162,3163/Del/2013
                                              M/s. HFCL Satellite Communication Ltd. vs. DCIT



4.      The first appellate authority should have disposed off the case on merit

instead of dismissing the appeal as infructuous. We do not understand how the first

appellate authority came to the conclusion that the assessee has affectively

withdrawn the appeal. Thus, we set aside the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) and

restore the matter to the file of the first appeal authority for fresh adjudication in

accordance with law.







5.     In the result the appeals of the assesee are allowed for statistical purposes.


       Order pronounced in the Open Court on 6th January,2015.


          sd/-                                     sd/-
          (A.T. VARKEY)                         (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY)
        JUDICIAL MEMBER                       ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


 Dated:            6th January, 2015
`veena'
Copy of the Order forwarded to:
1.    Appellant
2.    Respondent
3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR
6.    Guard File

                                                              By Order


                                                              Deputy Registrar




                                                                                                2

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Careers

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions