Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

Chintan Babaria, 98, Princes Street, Mansoor Building, Mumbai-400002 Vs. Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax -14(3), Earnest House, 3rd Floor, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021
January, 20th 2015
                    ,                  ""          
      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "C" BENCH, MUMBAI

BEFORE HON'BLE S/SHRI H.L. KARWA, PRESIDENT AND B.R.BASKARAN (AM)
         .. ,                            .. ,   
                   ./I.T.A. No.6163/Mum/2012
                 (   / Assessment Year :2009-10)

  Chintan Babaria,                /        Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax
  98, Princes Street,             Vs.      -14(3),
  Mansoor Building,                        Earnest House, 3rd Floor,
  Mumbai-400002                            Nariman Point,
                                           Mumbai-400021
        ( /Appellant)              ..      (    / Respondent)


                . /   . / PAN/GIRNo. :AICPB4114G

            / Appellant by              : Shri Nishit Gandhi
              /Respondent by              Shri Neil Philip


              / Date of Hearing
                                                 :31.12.2014
             /Date of Pronouncement : 16.01.2015


                                / O R D E R

 Per B.R.BASKARAN, Accountant Member:

       The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 25-
 06-2012 passed by ld CIT(A)-25, Mumbai and it relates to the assessment
 year 2009-10. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld CIT(A) in
 confirming the disallowance made u/s 14A of the Act.

 2.    We have heard the parties and perused the record. The contention
 of the assessee is that his own funds are in excess of the loan funds.
 Further the loan funds have been taken for specific purposes, i.e., for
 purchase of trucks and lorries, since the assessee is a transport operator.
 He further submitted that the interest expenses claimed by the assessee
 relate to the loan taken for purchase of trucks and lorries. Accordingly, he
                                                                     6163/M/2012
                                     2







submitted that there is no requirement to make any disallowance out of
interest expenditure u/s 14A of the Act.
3.    A perusal of the financial statements filed by the assessee in the
paper book would show that the assessee has claimed interest expenses
relating to the loan taken for purchase of trucks and lorries. Hence we
find merit in the submissions of the assessee. Accordingly, we hold that
the interest expenditure is not required to be disallowed u/s 14A of the
Act. With regard to the disallowance of administrative expenses, the Ld
A.R did not press the same in view of the smallness of the amount.
Accordingly we confirm the disallowance of administrative expenses made
u/s 14A of the Act. The order of Ld CIT(A) stands modified accordingly.






4.    In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed.

      The above order was pronounced in the open court on 16 th
Jan,2015.
           16                        th Jan 2015    
      sd                                           sd

(.. / H.L. KARWA)                          (..  ,/ B.R. BASKARAN)
  / PRESIDENT                                /Accountant Member
  Mumbai: 16th Jan, 2015.


. ../ SRL , Sr. PS

        /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.  / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.      ,     ,                   /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.


                                                             / BY ORDER,
            true copy
                                                (Asstt. Registrar)
                                               ,  /ITAT, Mumbai

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting