Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- Circle-7(1), New Delhi Vs. M/s Saptgiri Commodity Pvt.Ltd., 77, Darya Ganj New Delhi.
January, 05th 2015
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                                `G' : NEW DELHI
                    DELHI BENCH `G'

           BEFORE SHRI I.C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
              SHRI B.C. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                             No.4372/Del/2013
                         ITA No.
                                         2006-
                                           06-07
                       Assessment Year : 2006


Assistant Commissioner of      Vs.    M/s Saptgiri Commodity Pvt.Ltd.,
Income Tax,                           77, Darya Ganj,
Circle-
Circle-7(1),                          New Delhi.
      Delhi.
New Delhi.                            PAN : AAICS8092H.
     (Appellant)                          (Respondent)

                                    No.04/Del/2014
                    Cross Objection No.0
                                         2006-07
                      Assessment Year : 2006-


M/s Saptgiri Commodity         Vs.    Assistant Commissioner of Income
Pvt.Ltd.,                             Tax,
77, Darya Ganj,                       Circle-
                                      Circle-7(1),
New Delhi.                            New Delhi.
PAN : AAICS8092H.
     (Appellant)                          (Respondent)

            Revenue by          :    Shri B.R.R. Kumar, Sr.DR.
            Assessee by         :    Shri J.S. Kochar, CA and
                                     Shri U.S. Kochar, Advocate.

                                ORDER

PER B.C. MEENA, AM :
      The appeal by the Revenue emanates from the order of learned
CIT(A)-X, New Delhi dated 3rd May, 2013 for the AY 2006-07.







2.    At the outset, the learned counsel for the assessee contends that
as per Central Board of Direct Taxes, Instruction No.3/2011 dated 09th
February, 2011, the revised limit for preferring revenue's appeals is `3
lacs. That the tax effect in the present revenue's appeal is below the
prescribed limit of `3 lacs. In view thereof, the revenue's appeal may
be dismissed as the tax effect being below the prescribed limit.
                                   2                        ITA-4372/Del/2013 &
                                                                 C.O. 4/Del/2014



3.    The learned Departmental Representative agrees to the said
position.


4.    We have heard both sides. The CBDT, vide above instruction has
clearly laid down that the revenue should not prefer appeals against
assessees before ITAT if the tax effect involved in the appeal,
excluding interest, is less than `3 lacs. The tax payable in the present
appeal being below `3 lacs, the revenue's appeal is dismissed as not
maintainable in view of CBDT Instruction.


5.    As we have dismissed the Revenue's appeal, the cross-objection
filed by the assessee has become infructuous and is accordingly
dismissed.







6.    In the result, the appeal of the Revenue and the cross-objection
of the assessee both are dismissed.
      Decision pronounced in the open Court on conclusion of hearing
on 1st January, 2015.


                 Sd/-                                Sd/-
                    SUDHIR)
              (I.C. SUDHIR)                           MEENA)
                                                (B.C. MEENA)
            JUDICIAL MEMBER                 ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated : 01.01.2015
VK.

Copy forwarded to: -

1.    Appellant  : Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
                   Circle-7(1), New Delhi.
                   Circle
2.    Respondent : M/s Saptgiri Commodity Pvt.Ltd.,
                   77, Darya Ganj, New Delhi.
3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR, ITAT

                              Assistant Registrar

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting