Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: TDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd
From the Courts »
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. M/s. Maruti Udyog Ltd
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 Vs. M/s. Mohan Export India Private Limited
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Oriental International Co. Pvt. Ltd.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Vs. British Motor Car Co.(1934) Ltd
  Vidyadayani Shiksha Samiti vs. CIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Halcrow Consulting India Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 ACIT vs. TRN Energy Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
 Aditya Chemicals Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 Gayatri Aggarwal Vs. Income Tax Commissioner & Ors.
 Paradigm Geophysical Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3, New Delhi
 Download Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017

Jay Sachhidanand Charitable Trust C/o Mukund Chhotalal Patel, Kumar Faliyu, Kharapat, Khambat-388620. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Baroda.
January, 30th 2014
        ,  Û `'  
                  "C" BENCH, AHMEDABAD


                          ITA No. 2652/Ahd/2013

       Jay Sachhidanand Charitable Trust                   Commissioner of
       C/o Mukund Chhotalal Patel,               Vs         Income Tax-I,
       Kumar Faliyu, Kharapat,                                 Baroda.
       PAN: AABTJ6085B

                     (Appellant)                           (Respondent)

                 Revenue by :           Sh. T.P. Krishnakumar, Sr. D.R.
                Assessee(s) by :        Sh. Rahul Patel, AR

           / Date of Hearing
           /                                           :    20/ 01/2014
            /Date of P ronouncement                    :    20/ 01/2014

                              /O R D E R


This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT-I dated

2.    The sole issue involved in this appeal is that the Ld. CIT-I, Baroda was
      not justified in rejecting the application u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act,

3.    The Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the registration u/s 12A was
      denied to the assessee as the assessee failed to furnish the copy of trust
                                             ITA No.2652/Ahd/2013
                 Jay Sachhidanand Charitable Trust Vs. CIT-I, Baroda
                                                   For A.Y. 2014-15

     deed with original that was filed with Commissioner of Charity and
     acknowledged by that authority and documentary evidence in the form
     of mark sheet, grade certificate etc. in respect of its claim of having
     rendered assistance to the needy school children, documentary evidence
     in respect of activities claimed to be carried out and therefore failed to
     establish the genuineness of the charitable activities. The assessee has
     filed before us during the course of hearing the certified copy of the
     trust deed obtained from Commissioner of Charity which could not be
     produced at the time of hearing before the CIT, and therefore, the matter
     should be restored back to the file of CIT for re-adjudication of the issue
     of registration of trust u/s 12A of the Act afresh after taking into
     account the copy of the trust deed now filed before us obtained from the
     Commissioner of Charity.         Further, the documentary evidence for
     genuineness of the activities carried out by the assessee was not to be
     examined by the CIT but was to be considered by the Assessing Officer
     at the time of the assessment of the trust.

4.   The Ld. DR also agreed that the issue should be restored to the file of
     Ld. CIT for fresh adjudication and activities of the trust are to be
     examined by the AO at the time of allowing deduction u/s 11 to the

5.   We find that no material was brought on record to show that the trust in
     question was not a genuine trust. The registration u/s 12A was denied
     mainly for want of original trust deed which was filed before the
     Commissioner of Charity.        In view of the submissions of both the
     parties, the issue of registration is restored back to the file of the CIT for
     adjudication afresh as the assessee submitted that they have received
     copy of the trust deed from Commissioner of Charity and are in a
     position now to file the same before the CIT. We therefore, set aside
                                               ITA No.2652/Ahd/2013
                   Jay Sachhidanand Charitable Trust Vs. CIT-I, Baroda
                                                     For A.Y. 2014-15

       the order of the Ld. CIT and restore the matter back to his file for
       adjudication of the issue of registration of the trust afresh after
       examining the copy of the trust received from Commissioner of Charity
       by the assessee. The assessee is also directed to file a copy of the trust
       deed received from Commissioner of Charity before the Ld. CIT as and
       when called upon to do so. Needless to mention that the Ld. CIT shall
       allow reasonable and proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee
       before adjudicating the issue afresh. Thus, the ground of appeal of the
       assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

6.     In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the Court at the close of the hearing in the presence
of the parties on Monday, the 20th January, 2014 at Ahmedabad.

           Sd/-                                        Sd/-
     (MUKUL Kr. SHRAWAT)                           ( N.S. SAINI)
       JUDICIAL MEMBER                         ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Ahmedabad;         Dated 20/01/2014
          Maurya, Sr. P.
Ghanshyam Maurya,     P.S.

                                 TRUE COPY
      Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1.    / The Appellant
2.   × / The Respondent.
3.      / Concerned CIT
4.    () / The CIT(A)-III, Ahmedabad
5.    ,   ,  / DR,
     ITAT, Ahmedabad
6.   [  / Guard file.
                                                                   / BY ORDER,

                                                 /  (Dy./Asstt.Registrar)
                                           ,  / ITAT, Ahmedabad
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions