Latest Expert Exchange Queries

Make your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment
 
 
From the Courts »
 Canyon Financial Services Ltd Vs. Income Tax Officer
 Chintels India Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax – Circle 8
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. International Tractors Ltd.
 Hcl Technologies Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-2 & Anr.
 New Delhi Television Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 John Fowler (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. The Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Iron and Steel Market Committee (Bombay High Court)
 KSS Petron Private Ltd vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 JK Mittal & Co vs. UOI (No. 2) (Delhi High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Shri Mahila Sewa Sahakari Bank Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
 Pr CIT Vs. PPC Business And Products Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court)

ITO, Room No. 225A, Central Revenue Building, New Delhi 110 002 VS. M/s Value Fabrics Pvt. Ltd.,52-Asalatpura, Badi Masjid,Moradabad-244001
January, 30th 2014
                                                           ITA NO. 3892/Del/2012


               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                    DELHI BENCH "H", NEW DELHI
            BEFORE SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                                          AND
                 SHRI A.T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER


                          I.T.A. No. 3892/Del/2012
                                 A.Y. : 2007-08
ITO, Room No. 225A,             VS.                   M/s Value Fabrics Pvt.
Central      Revenue                                  Ltd.,
Building, New Delhi ­                                 52-Asalatpura,
110 002                                               Badi Masjid,
                                                      Moradabad-244001
                                                      (UP)
                                                      (PAN: AABCV4422D)

(APPELLANT)                                           (RESPONDENT)

           Assessee by                :     Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Sr. Adv., Sh.
                                            Ashwani Taneja, Adv., Sh. Somil
                                            Agarwal,
          Department by               :     Ms. Nidhi Srivastava, Sr. D.R.


                              ORDER
PER SHAMIM YAHYA: AM
     This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the
Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-XIX), New Delhi                 dated
24.5.2012 pertaining to assessment year 2007-08.

2.   The grounds raised read as under:-


     i)    Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on the facts of the case in
           setting aside the issue of addition of Rs. 1,75,20,000/-
           made by the AO under section 68 of the I.T. Act as the
           Income Tax Act, 1961 does not confer any power on the
           CIT(A) to set aside the assessment.




                                      1
                                                         ITA NO. 3892/Del/2012


      ii)    Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on the facts of the case in
             accepting additional evidences in contravention of Rule
             46A of the I.T. Rules, 1962 without confronting the AO.

      iii)   Ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on the facts of the case in
             allowing the expenses of Rs. 51,601/- on the basis of
             additional evidence accepted by him by violating the
             provisions of Rule 46A of the I.T. Rules.

      iv)    The appellant craves, leave or reserving the right to
             amend, modify, alter, add or forgo any ground(s) of
             appeal at any time before or during the hearing of this
             appeal.

3.    In this case the AO       noted that    perusal of return of the
assessee reveals that during the year the assessee has             received
share application money of Rs. 1,75,20,000/-.            Despite several
opportunities assessee failed to comply with the notices of the AO.
AO observed      that the onus was upon the assessee to prove the
creditworthiness and genuineness and identity of the shareholders.
Since the same was not done, AO treated the same as undisclosed
income       of the assessee and added the same under section 68 of
the I.T. Act.




4.    Before the Ld. CIT(A)     assessee submitted that assessee has
only received Rs. 12,00,000/- share application money during the
financial year 2006-07. The balance of Rs. 1,63,20,000/- was share
application money received during the financial year 2005-06. The
total of the aforesaid sums as on 31.3.2007 came to Rs.
1,75,20,000/-. In this regard, copy       of the balance sheet of the
assessee was referred which was said to have been filed alongwith
the return.      Regarding the share       application    money of Rs.
12,00,000/- received during the financial year 2006-07 from three

                                     2
                                                     ITA NO. 3892/Del/2012


parties, assessee submitted copy of      application for shares and
confirmation letter and PAN Number.      Considering the above, Ld.
CIT(A) directed as under:-

                "Since the documents and the details as mentioned
                in above paras are filed for the first time ­ either by
                the AR on his own or on enquiry from the
                undersigned in these proceedings ­ in the interest
                of justice, the AO is hereby directed to verify the
                genuineness of the documents and the contentions
                of the AR and if he is satisfied with the explanation,
                no addition is called for. The issue of addition of Rs.
                1,75,20,000/- is set aside for limited verification as
                mentioned above."

5.   Against the above Order the Revenue is in appeal before us.

6.   We have heard both the counsel and perused the records. We
find that as regards the contention of the assessee that the amount
of Rs. 12,00,000/- was received as share application money for the
impugned financial year and the balance Rs. 1,63,20,000/- pertain to
financial year 2005-06, it is a matter of factual verification. If the
assessee has only received Rs. 12,00,000/- share application money
during financial year 2006-07, AO can consider only the said amount
u/s. 68 of the IT Act for A.Y. 2007-08.     Rest amount cannot be
considered in the current year as share application money receipt
under section 68 of the I.T. Act. Accordingly, we remit this issue to
the file of the AO.     The AO shall make examination            of the
submissions of the assessee and decide as per directions as above.

7.   As regard the balance amount of share application money

amounting to Rs. 12,00,000/- received from three parties, assessee


                                  3
                                                           ITA NO. 3892/Del/2012


has not submitted any document whatsoever before the AO.

Assessee   has   submitted   copy       of   application   of   shares     and

confirmation and PAN number before the Ld. CIT(A).                Ld. CIT(A)

remitted these documents and the contention of the Ld. AR to the

file of the AO for examination.   Ld. CIT(A) further directed that if the

AO is satisfied with the explanation, no addition is called for.

Against the above directions, Revenue is in appeal before us.


8.   We find that Revenue's contention in this regard is correct that

Ld. CIT(A) does not have any power to set aside the issue to AO.

However, we find that assessee has failed to submit the relevant

documents before the AO. However, he has submitted some details

before the Ld. CIT(A). In our considered opinion, interest of justice

will be served, if the matter is remitted to the file of the AO.

Accordingly, we remit this issue to the file of the AO.             AO shall

examine the issue afresh regarding the identity of the depositors,

genuineness of the transactions and the creditworthiness of the

share applicants.   Needless to add that the assessee should be

granted adequate opportunity of being heard.


9.   Ground No. 3 raised by the Revenue is regarding the allowance

of expenses of Rs. 51,601/-. We find that the same is not arising out

of the order of the Ld. CIT(A). Hence, the same is dismissed.







                                    4
                                                     ITA NO. 3892/Del/2012


10.   In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed
for statistical purposes.

      Order pronounced in the Open Court on 23/1/2014,             upon
conclusion of hearing.




      Sd/-                                              Sd/-

       VARKEY]
 [A.T. VARKEY]                                  [SHAMIM YAHYA]
JUDICIAL MEMBER                             ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Date 23/1/2014
"SRBHATNAGAR"
Copy forwarded to: -
1.    Appellant -

2.    Respondent -
3.    CIT
4.    CIT (A)
5.    DR, ITAT


                            TRUE COPY
                                                  By Order,




                                                 Assistant Registrar,
                                                 ITAT, Delhi Benches




                                  5
    ITA NO. 3892/Del/2012




6

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Integrated Software Solutions Integrated Software Development Integrated Software Services Integrated Software Solutions India Integrated Softw

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions