News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
« Indirect Tax »
 How much tax do you need to pay for your equity investments?
 Income Tax Department proposes new norms for taxing MNCs in India
 Can you claim tax benefit for tax paid on insurance premium? a
 Top 30 Income Tax Judgments in 2018
 Urban Development and Housing Department, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand
 National Rural Health Mission, Faridabad - Haryana
  Govt fails to release exporters’ pending sales tax refund claims
 Govt fails to release exporters’ pending sales tax refund claims
 How is dividend income taxed Here’s all you need to know
 How is dividend income taxed Here’s all you need to know
 How is dividend income taxed Here’s all you need to know

I-T Officer must give taxpayer reasons for reopening case: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal
January, 11th 2013

An income-tax officer is bound to inform a taxpayer his reasons for reopening an income-tax assessment, so that the taxpayer is given an opportunity to file his objections to such reopenings, according to a recent order by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore. Usually, income-tax department reopens a completed assessment if it has reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment.

The taxpayer, in this case, was the Ireland-based software company Synopsis International, which is in the business of selling and marketing software licences.

The taxpayer company was served a notice for reopening the assessment under section 147 of the I-T Act. The company had asked the assessing officer for a copy of the recorded reasons for reopening of the assessment, but the assessing officer did not furnish a copy of the same. Instead, the assessing officer passed a reassessment order and served a copy of it to the taxpayer, along with the recorded reasons for the reassessment.

The taxpayer company moved the ITAT claiming that the reassessment order was void since reasons for reopening the assessment had not been furnished to it before passing the order. The ITAT decided the case in favour of the taxpayer.

The ITAT, in support of its order, cited the Supreme Court order in the case of GKN Driveshafts 259 ITR. In this case, the apex court held that the assessing officer has to supply a copy of the recorded reasons for reopening an assessment within a timeframe to enable the assessee to file its objections. It further said, basic rules of natural justice demand that the taxpayer be informed of the reasons on the basis of which the assessing officer formed an opinion.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2019 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Portfolio

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions