Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Indirect Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 When will ITR1 forms become available for tax filing. Check details
 How to reduce tax on rent from vacant houses
 Make sure to claim these tax deductions
 Investment tips for those opting for new tax regime
 Indirect tax dept issues notices to companies over late input credit claim under GST frame
 E-generated document required for indirect tax notices
 FinMin seeks industry inputs on direct, indirect tax changes
 Govt gives businesses four months to settle indirect tax disputes
 ITR filing becomes easy via new 'e-Filing Lite' portal - 5 things to know Income Tax Return
 No income tax on interest from accident compensation: High Court
 How much tax do you need to pay for your equity investments?

I-T Officer must give taxpayer reasons for reopening case: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal
January, 11th 2013

An income-tax officer is bound to inform a taxpayer his reasons for reopening an income-tax assessment, so that the taxpayer is given an opportunity to file his objections to such reopenings, according to a recent order by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore. Usually, income-tax department reopens a completed assessment if it has reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment.

The taxpayer, in this case, was the Ireland-based software company Synopsis International, which is in the business of selling and marketing software licences.

The taxpayer company was served a notice for reopening the assessment under section 147 of the I-T Act. The company had asked the assessing officer for a copy of the recorded reasons for reopening of the assessment, but the assessing officer did not furnish a copy of the same. Instead, the assessing officer passed a reassessment order and served a copy of it to the taxpayer, along with the recorded reasons for the reassessment.

The taxpayer company moved the ITAT claiming that the reassessment order was void since reasons for reopening the assessment had not been furnished to it before passing the order. The ITAT decided the case in favour of the taxpayer.

The ITAT, in support of its order, cited the Supreme Court order in the case of GKN Driveshafts 259 ITR. In this case, the apex court held that the assessing officer has to supply a copy of the recorded reasons for reopening an assessment within a timeframe to enable the assessee to file its objections. It further said, basic rules of natural justice demand that the taxpayer be informed of the reasons on the basis of which the assessing officer formed an opinion.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting