Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: TDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit
 
 
« ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai Statement Showing The list of Special Bench Cases Pendign for 2016 as on 16/11/2016
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Benches, Pune Constitution Of Pune Benches. Division Bench From 23/01/2017 To 25/01/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches Ahmedabad S/shri N.K. Billaiya, Am & Mahavir Prasad, Jm Causelist For Bench 'A' Date : 16/01/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Benches, Mumbai Consolidated Cause List of SA/ MA/Pronouncement for Friday 20.01.2017
 Income Tax appellate Tribunal Jaipur Benches Jaipur Constitution of Benches for the Period from 16/01/2017
 Income Tax appellate Tribunal Constitution of Benches for the Period from 16/01/2017 To 09/02/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Benches Mumbai Consolidated Cause List of SA/MA/Pronouncement for Friday 13.01.2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Benches Mumbai Consolidated Cause List of SA/MA/Pronouncement for Friday 13.01.2017
  Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata Benches Kolkata Constitution of kolkata Benches for One Week From 16.01.2017 To 19/01/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata Benches, Kolkata Consolidated list of Orders for Pronouncement on06/01/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chenni Benches, Chenni Constitution for The week 09/01/2017 To 12/01/2017

P.V. Ramana Reddy vs. ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
January, 20th 2012
S. 271(1)(c): Despite Surrender After Detection, Penalty Can be Waived
 
Pursuant to a search & s. 153A assessment on the basis of seized papers, statements etc; the assessee offered additional income of Rs. 2.68 crores on the basis that he was unable to explain the old records. Some of the other additions made by the AO were partly deleted by the CIT (A) & Tribunal. The AO & CIT (A) levied s. 271(1)(c) penalty on the ground that the assessees offer of additional income was not voluntary or bona fide. On appeal by the assessee to the Tribunal, HELD allowing the appeal:

Though the assessee owned the unaccounted transactions only after search action, when an assessee admits his mistake and that he has committed a wrong and offers the additional income to tax, it cannot be said that his statement is false or not bona fide. Neither the CIT (A) nor the Tribunal were completely clear about the exact amount of concealment and there was no conclusive evidence as some additions had been deleted. S. 271(1)(c) gives discretion to the AO to exonerate the assessee from levy of penalty even in case where the assessee has concealed the income or furnished incorrect particulars of income. Penalty should not be imposed merely because it is lawful to do so. The AO has to exercise his discretion judiciously. If an assessee files a revised return though at a later stage or discloses true income, penalty need not be levied. No doubt, merely offering additional income will not automatically protect the assessee from levy of penalty but in a given case where the assessee came forward with additional income though after detection because he was not in a position to explain the seized material properly and expresses remorse in his conduct un-hesitantly, the AO has to exercise the discretion in favour of such assessee as otherwise the expression may in s. 271(1)(c) becomes redundant. In a case of admitted income, concealment penalty is not automatic. The discretion vested in the AO should be used not to levy penalty. On facts, the case was most befitting to exercise such discretion because there was divergent opinion while deleting or sustaining the addition and there was no conclusive proof that the assessee concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income. The assessees offer was to avoid litigation. If the AO had clinching evidence of concealment, he should not have accepted the assessees offer and should have proceeded on the basis of material on record (VIP Industries 112 TTJ 289, Siddharth Enterprises 184 TM 460 (P&H) & Reliance Petro Products 322 ITR 158 (SC) followed).
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Web Application Development Web based Software Solution Web Application Deployment Web Application Solutions Web Application Software Development Web Application Deployment Web Application Programming Web Application Design and Development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions