Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: TDS :: VAT RATES :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
 
 
« ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bangalore Benches , BangaloreRevised Constitution for the week from 20/11/2017 To 24/11/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches , Ahmedabad S/shri Kul Bharat, JM & Manish Borad, AM Causelist For Bench 'A' 20/11/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Benches, Pune. Causelist For Bench 'A' For The Ending 24.11.17
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches, Hyderabad. Cause List Of Cases Posted Before B-Bench (Db & Smc) - 20.11.17 To 24.11.17
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches , Ahmedabad S/shri Kul Bharat, Jm & Manish Borad, Am Causelist For Bench 'A'
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches, Hyderabad. Cause List Of Cases Posted Before A-Bench (Db) - 20.11.17 To 24.11.2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal : Kolkata Benches : Kolkata List Of Orders Ready For Pronouncement On 17 .11.2017.
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Benches, Mumbai Consolidated Cause list of SA/MA/Pronouncement for Friday 17/11/2017
 IncomTax Appellate Tribunal: Bangalore Benches : Bangalore Constitution of Kolkata Benches From 13/11/2017 To 17/11/2017
 IncomTax Appellate Tribunal: Kolkata Benches : Kolkata Constitution of Kolkata Benches From 27/11/2017 To 30/11/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Benches, Bangalore. Constitution for the week from 13.11.17 To 17.11.17

Demag Cranes & Components (India) vs. DCIT (ITAT Pune)
January, 16th 2012
Transfer Pricing: TPO is duty bound to eliminate differences in comparables data
 
In a Transfer Pricing matter, the Tribunal had to consider whether for purposes of making adjustment under Rule 10B (1)(e)(iii) working capital constituted a difference between the international transactions and the comparable uncontrolled transactions of between the enterprises entering into such transactions and if so whether the said difference could materially affect the amount of net profit margin of relevant transactions in the open market. HELD by the Tribunal:
 
Rule 10B(e)(iii) provides that the profit margin arising in comparable uncontrolled transactions has to be adjusted to take into account the differences, if any between the international transaction and the comparable uncontrolled transactions, or between the enterprises entering into such transactions, which could materially affect the amount of net profit margin in the open market. While the differences are not specified, it covers any differences which could materially affect the amount of net profit margin. The litmus test to be applied is if the difference, if any, is capable of affecting the NPM in open market? If yes, then the TPO is under statutory obligation to eliminate such differences. The revenue cannot say that difference is likely to exist in all accounts and so the demands of the assessee should be ignored. The revenues stand that the assessee is ineligible for any adjustments if he provides the set of comparable is not correct because under Rule 10(3) it is the duty of the AO/TPO/DRP to minimize/eliminate the difference which is likely to materially affect the price. It is the settled proposition that working capital adjustment is an adjustment that is required to be made in TNMM. The revenues contention that the differences specified should refer to only (i) the factor of demand and supply; (ii) existence of marketable intangibles i.e. brand name etc; (iii) geographical location and the like is not acceptable. Further, as the difference in the Arms length Operating Margin of the Comparables before and after making the adjustment for working capital was up to 3.77%, it was material and had to be eliminated (Mentor Graphics 109 ITD 101 (Del), E-gain Communication 118 ITD 243 (Pune) Sony India 114 ITD 448 (Del) & TNT India followed)
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Application Management Solutions Application Management System Application Management Software System Application Management Development Application Management Software Development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions