Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Income Tax Return Filing: 10 Mistakes To Avoid When Filing ITR For AY 2024-25
 Old vs New Tax Regime: Who should move to the New Tax Regime from the old one?
 Income Tax Calculator FY 2023-24: How To Know Your Tax Liability Online On IT Dept's Portal?
 BackBack Income Tax Act amendment on cards on tax treatment of MSME dues
 ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 available for e-filing. Check details here
 Income tax slabs FY 2024-25: Experts share these 8 benefits for taxpayers in new income tax regime
 How To File ITR Online - Step by Step Guide to Efile Income Tax Return, FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)
 Old or new tax regime for TDS on salary? This post-election 2024 event will impact your tax planning
 What Are 5 Heads Of Income Tax?
 Income Tax Dept releases interim action plan for FY25 on tax collection, refund approvals
  Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80

SC dismisses plea against Satyam
January, 05th 2010

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the Company Law Boards order facilitating takeover of the scam-tainted Satyam Computers by the Mahindra group and allowed the IT firm to go ahead with the process to rope in a strategic investor through a public auction. A Bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan dismissed the petition filed by an advocate Manohar Lal Sharma, who claimed to be a shareholder of the company.

Stating that the CLB had no powers to acquire forcefully controlling/ownership right of the shareholder of the company without its consent, Sharma sought stay on the auction of Satyams share on the ground that the government-appointed board of the company had taken a unilateral decision to sell the stake to a third party without convening any general meeting of the shareholders.

The petition also said no meeting of the shareholders of the fraud-hit company had been called so far for any kind of reference and approvals, which was illegal.

All actions based on the CLB order of February 19, 2009, must be stayed with immediate effect, the petition said.

According to the petitioner, a company having Rs 1,800 crore receivable in hand and fixed assets of Rs 2,038 crore with no creditors and annual services fees of foreign currency return worth Rs 6,000 crore had been sold out in the hand of the third party at a throwaway price.

However, solicitor-general Gopal Subramanium opposed the petition saying Sharmas plea was earlier dismissed by the Delhi High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court and even the apex court.

He alleged that Sharma had no shares when the Satyam scam was unearthed but had later purchased its shares.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting