Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: cpt :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
 
 
General »
 Banks will have a hard slog ahead to get GST-ready
 Clarification regarding applicability of Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act. 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act. 1956
 Introduce indemnity clauses with suppliers on tax compliance: Expert
 While filing tax in India, NRIs do not have to report overseas assets
  Clarification regarding applicability of Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act. 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act. 1956 -reg.
 SH. VISHWA NATH GUPTA Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL, KANPUR AND ANR.
 No tax scrutiny of big transaction if it matches income
 Clarification regarding applicability of Section 16 (1)(a) of the Companies Act. 2013 with reference to cases under corresponding provisions of Companies Act. 1956 -reg.
  Home loan tax reliefs often missed by taxpayers
 Income tax department launches online facility for linking Aadhaar and PAN
 Home loan tax reliefs often missed by taxpayers

IRDA, SEBI war may hit ULIP listings
January, 25th 2010

The battle between the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) over the regulation of unit-linked insurance plans could affect the plans of companies aiming to list unless the differences are resolved soon.

Life companies, when contacted, said they would stick to the line that the products come under IRDA regulation and are unlikely to either stop selling ULIPs or obtain registration with SEBI. Insurers say for the issue to be now closed, the regulators will have to sort it out among themselves or it will require the intervention of the government.

Among life insurance companies, Reliance Life Insurance had announced its intent to go for an IPO. Some time ago, HDFC Standard Life too had said it would look at an IPO in 2010-11. The Aditya Birla Group is looking at hiving off its financial services business under a new entity an exercise which would require listing of the new arm.

Although there are no guidelines in place for life insurance IPOs, IRDA is expected to come out with disclosure norms for companies seeking a listing by end February. Following this, SEBI is also expected to come out with the disclosure requirement in a couple of months. Only after the market regulation notifies the disclosure norms, the first life insurance company can go public.

When contacted by ET, Reliance Capital chief executive Sam Ghosh, said: We hope this issue gets resolved before we file our draft prospectus.

Most of the life companies do not agree with SEBIs interpretation of laws with respect to regulation of ULIPs. The market regulator last week wrote to most of the life insurance companies stating that their ULIP products raise money from the public and the money is invested in a fund chosen by public and the calculation is through net asset value which is unitised fund value.

According to SEBI, all these characteristics are akin to mutual fund schemes.

The market watchdog has cited Section 12(1)b of the SEBI Act, which says no person shall sponsor or carry on any venture capital fund, or collective investment scheme, including mutual funds, unless he obtains a certificate of registration from the board.

Collective investment schemes as defined under Section 11A of the SEBI Act clearly excludes contracts of insurance under the Insurance Act, said V Srinivasan, chief financial officer of Bharti Axa Life Insurance. He added that in a sense, insurance has always been a collective investment scheme where resources are mobilised for investment and ULIP is only one way of accounting and does not change the fundamental basis of insurance.

Incidentally, the provision on Collective Investment Schemes was introduced to regulate entities such as promoters of plantation schemes or timeshare schemes who escaped regulations in the past.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - About Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions