Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd :: list of goods taxed at 4%
« Auditing »
 Time Limit For Completion Of Assessment From The Date Of Special Auditor’s Report Under Income Tax Act, 1961
 Provisioning pertaining to Fraud Accounts
 Tax Audit Report (TAR) Certain exceptions and increased limits according to number of partners and considering nature of activity are desirable
 Cost Auditing Standards [ Cost Audit Documentation (102)] – Part-II
 Conference on Companies Act gets under way
 New bureau to dissolve state-run banks' power to choose auditors
 Foreign Exchange Management (Permissible Capital Account Transactions) (Fourth Amendment) Regulations, 2015
 ICAI forms 'prima facie' view on NSEL auditor
 Firms appoint new auditors in shift to meet new standards
 Cadre restructuring in I-T dept may open scrutiny of closed cases
 RBI issues new guidelines on concurrent auditing at branches

Scope of an audit is different from that of an investigation
January, 29th 2009
Investigators, regulators and stakeholders of fraud-hit Satyam Computer Services attribute auditors failure in detecting the fraud to either negligence, incompetence or blatant connivance with the promoters who cooked books for years. Ideally, auditors, who accept hefty fee, should ensure that they independently verify all documents they rely on before certifying the financial statements of a company as a true and fair account of its financial health. The auditing norms require auditors to write to a bank where deposits are held and get a reply at their address, said Ved Jain, president, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), the body that regulates the profession of chartered accountants in India. However, how deep an auditor should go in his work of verifying the accounts of a company with several subsidiaries and giving his opinion about its financial health within a fortnight remain a debatable issue and is likely to get a greater regulatory attention in the coming days. People cheat their wives without they ever suspecting. Systematic fraud by senior management and suicide bombings are two things impossible to prevent, said a top professional with one of the Big Four accounting firms in the world, preferring anonymity. This argument gets a strong support from a Bombay High Court verdict that exonerated an audit firm two-decade ago. The 1986 verdict, that came in a case between audit firm A F Ferguson & Company and Tri-Sure India, said auditors must not be made liable for not tracking out ingenious and carefully laid schemes of fraud when there is nothing to arouse their suspicion and when these frauds are perpetrated by the tried servants of the company and are undetected for years by the directors. Referring to the Satyam case, professionals say it is unfair to judge the work of an auditor in the light of the confessions made subsequently since he did not have the benefit of that information or a reason to be suspicious while auditing. Two partners in two different accounting firms, both in the Big Four league, argue that the scope of an audit is different from that of an investigation. There is a clear distinction between the work of an auditor and the investigation of a detective. The auditors mind is unbiased unlike that of an investigator who approaches work with the presumption that a fraud has taken place. The auditor does a sample checking of invoices and documents after assessing how effective is the internal risk controls in the firm. Based on that, he makes an inference about the authenticity of other similar documents. This sampling is just a drop in the ocean of invoices and documents that the company produces. Verifying the authenticity of all that material is outside the scope of statutory audit, said one of them. When the auditor stumbles upon something suspicious, he carries out more checks and additional verification, which still fall short of an investigation, added the other. Besides, an auditor does not guarantee the accuracy of a financial statement, he only expresses his view that the accounts of the company give a true and fair picture of its state of affairs as per the explanations given to him. Auditors say there is a sea of difference between a true and fair picture and an accurate picture, an expression auditors do not use while signing the financial statements. Further, auditors often qualify their view if they are not satisfied with the explanations given to them. Normally, an audit firm would deploy about 40-50 people for the audit of a company like Satyam that has several offices and subsidiaries in India and abroad. Two or three professionals would go through the records of individual branches and report to a core team of five or six. Each branch or subsidiaries will have thousands of invoices and documents to go through. It is impossible to independently verify all of them. Auditors make an audit strategy based on factors like the risk profile of the company and the sector, internal controls in place, and the track record of the promoters. Only a relevant sample of documents is independently verified. Otherwise, audit work would translate to a full-fledged investigation, which would never end, argue experts. However, regulators say that firms should accept fewer audit assignments if they cannot do a proper job. A SEBI official, who asked not to be named, said that if auditors rely on the reputation of promoters and board members, then investors and regulators do not require statutory auditing of companies. They can directly rely on the companys reputation and be satisfied, he said. Auditors, who charge hefty fee, should not resort to short cuts, he added. The gap between publics expectation from auditors and what they can deliver is set to get addressed soon.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Organic SEO Outsourcing Organic Search Engine Optimization Outsourcing Organic Website SEO Organic SEO India Website SEO India Organic Search Engine Optimization India Organic Internet SEO India Organic Web

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions