Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Deadline to file updated ITR FY20-21 ends on March 31: Details on additional tax
 4 tax-planning mistakes to avoid this season
 ITR 2024: Here are 8 ways by which senior citizens can save on taxes this year
 Tax-saving investments for senior citizens: Here are 4 ways to maximise your tax savings
 11 ways of tax savings for salaried individuals for FY 2023-24
 How selling equities before March 31 can help you save income tax
 Income tax benefits for senior citizens on interest income from savings, fixed deposits explained in eight points

GST regime may mitigate the tax cost
January, 25th 2008

In last few years the price of commercial real estate has increased manifold, primarily due to rapid economic growth and increase in commercial activity leading to high demand for commercial office space. Levy of service tax on renting of commercial property with effect from June 1, 2007 has further aggravated the situation.

The service tax has been levied on all forms of leasing and licensing of immovable property for furtherance of business and commerce, including factories, office buildings, warehouses, etc.

This levy has been challenged by the trade/industry circles on various grounds. The most important issue that has been raised is about the authority of the Union government to levy tax on rentals. This is because service tax is a Union subject, whereas tax on land and building is a State domain. It is further being argued by many that renting of immovable property does not involve any element of service.

Recently, in a writ petition filed before the Madras High Court, an interim injunction was granted by the court restraining the government from collecting service tax on rent of commercial space. Though the injunction would apply only to the petitioner, the final decision in this regard is awaited with anticipation.

While the levy itself is a subject of contention, the applicability of service tax on lease agreements signed prior to date of introduction of this levy is also not free from doubt. It can be argued that in the case of renting, the taxable event would be the date when the service provider parts with the property in favour of the tenant. Accordingly, it can be argued that such existing lease transactions should not attract service tax.

This view also draws support from a CBEC circular issued in relation to Banking and other Financial Services. It was clarified that lease or hire purchase agreements entered prior to the date of introduction of the levy would not be charged to tax, so long as the property/ goods have also been received by the lessee before the introduction of the levy. Further, in a recent tribunal judgment in relation to applicability of service tax on hire-purchase agreements, it has been held that the higher rate of service tax would not be applicable for the contracts executed prior to hike in the rate of tax.

However, the revenue authorities are likely to take a view that renting is a continuous service and, therefore,

rentals received after the date of introduction of this levy would be subject to service tax. This could result in litigation between the taxpayers and the revenue authorities. Since it is not uncommon to have long-term lease contracts, an appropriate clarification on the issue would help the taxpayers.

While the impact of this levy is being felt by various sections of trade and industry, the levy is having significant impact on retail sector. Its so because retailers are not able to claim any credit of the service tax paid on rentals in the absence of any service tax or excise duty liability on their output.

Given these controversies and issues, it is interesting to wait and watch the outcome of the decision of the Madras High Court on this issue. If the court rules in favour of taxpayers, it will be received with a sigh of relief. However, if that is not the case, taxpayers will have no choice but to look forward to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, which would probably allow seamless flow of tax credits between goods and services and mitigate the tax cost.

Siddharth Mehta, Manish Mishra
The writers are with KPMG India

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting