sitemap   Home | Registration | Expert Exchange | Viewer's Forum | Currency Converter | Apply for News Correspondent  
 
 

Finance Act 2008 enacted-Service Tax provisions to be in force

Salient features of Finance Bill, 2008 by Ved Jain

Salaried Class IT Refund information by Income Tax Deptt

 
   
 
News Search:
 
   
 
« From the Courts »
 SC modifies Advance Ruling on FBT and rules AAR with respect was not correct in its view in reading the words 'in India' after the word residence in sub-section (3)
 Whether the amortization loss computed under Rule 9A is subject to or not subject to the provisions of section 80 and section 139 of the Income Tax Act
 Powers of CIT - Cancellation of: Registration of charitable trust, Cancellation on mere search
 Capital Gains: Enhanced compensation received - Year of taxability: Law applicable
 Validity of: Exparte order - Condition precedent: Specific notice
 Validity of: Re-assessment - Fresh facts received
 Quite frequently, allegations of ‘benami-ship’ surface for content and refutation
 Payment of non­compete fee by the Assessee was a business expenditure and not a capital expenditure
 Claim of deduction on customs duty drawback under Section 80-IB of the Act- duty drawback is profit or gain derived from the business of an industrial undertaking
 SC rules a person will become an ordinarily resident only if he has been residing in nine out of ten preceding years; and he has been in India for at least 730 days in the previous seven years
 Full Bench of SC rules special audit of the accounts of the assessee-since an order under Section 142 (2A) does entail civil consequences, the rule audi alteram partem is required to be observed

Chargeable interest - Interest on government securities
January, 30th 2008

CIT vs Corporation Bank and Ors.
Citation 295 ITR 193 
 
Affirmed CIT vs Vijaya Bank 149 TAXMAN 674; 194 Taxation 681; 199 CTR 329; 285 ITR 97

Chargeable interest - Interest on government securities
The interest earned by the assessee bank on government securities was not chargeable to tax under the Interest Tax Act 1974.

Supreme Court of India

CIT vs Corporation Bank and Ors.

Civil Appeal No. 1770 of 2006 with Civil Appeals Nos. 1771 to 1773, 2188 to 2191, 2646, 3047 of 2006, and Civil Appeals Nos. 138, 3186 and 3187 of 2007

S.H. Kapadia and B. Sudershan Reddy, JJ

19 July 2007

Mohan Parasaran, Additional Solicitor-General of India (Alka Sharma, Raghavendra Rao, Kailash Pandey and B. V. Balaram Das, Advocates, with him) for the Appellant
G. Sarangan, Sr. Adv. (Sanjay Kunur, R. N. Keshwani and N. N. Keshvani, Advs. with him) for the Respondent

ORDER

Leave granted in special leave petitions.

The short point which arises in this batch of civil appeals is whether interest earned by the assessee-banks on dated Government securities was liable to be assessed under section 2(7) read with section 4 of the Interest-tax Act, 1974. In our view, there is a basic difference between loans and advances on the one hand and investments/securities on the other. This difference is indicated in the provisions of the Income-tax Act, the Companies Act as well as the Banking Regulation Act. These aspects have been discussed in detail in two decisions of the Bombay High Court, namely, Discount and Finance House of India Ltd. v. S. K. Bhardwaj, CIT reported in [2003] 259 ITR 295, as also in another decision of the Bombay High Court reported in [2003] 259 ITR 312 in the case of CIT v. United Western Bank Ltd. It is not in dispute that the Revenue has accepted the aforestated two judgments of the Bombay High Court. We are in agreement with the view expressed by the Bombay High Court.

For the aforestated reasons there is no merit in the civil appeals filed by the Department. The same are dismissed. No order as to costs.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2006 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.