sitemap   Home | Registration | Expert Exchange | Viewer's Forum | Currency Converter | Apply for News Correspondent  
 
 

Finance Act 2008 enacted-Service Tax provisions to be in force

Salient features of Finance Bill, 2008 by Ved Jain

Salaried Class IT Refund information by Income Tax Deptt

 
   
 
News Search:
 
   
 
« News Headlines »
 Rajasthan pays I-T for acquiring land for IIT
 ‘Improve methodology for ranking ease of paying taxes’
 Service tax refund extended to 3 more export-based services
 Out of pocket expenses reimbursed on actual basis are not includable in the value of the Service Tax-
 Transaction between associated enterprises
 Service Tax Rules amended-Service Tax Notification No.19
 Finance Ministry notifies 16th May 2008 as the date on which service tax provisions
 Service taxability of construction and sale of residential units
 Maintenance of documents for transfer pricing
 Delhi to soon have its own excise legislation
 Tata Industries pays Rs 45-cr to the I-T dept for AT&T stake

Simplify tax structure: Mahratta Chamber
January, 24th 2007
Simplification and rationalisation of procedural aspect of taxation are among the salient demands made by the Mahratta Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture (MCCIA) in its pre-budget memorandum submitted to the finance minister. 
 
The memorandum, prepared by Chandrashekgar Chitale, head of chamber’s taxation sub-committee, seeks abolition of bank cash transaction tax, restoration of standard deduction, removal of harsh provisions of the TDS norms and a complete withdrawl of the fringe benefit tax. 
 
Pointing out that the rationale behind the bank cash transaction tax was to create a tax-trail on black money transactions through the banking channel, the memorandum said information can always be collected without imposing a tax. 
 
The memorandum has demanded that to maintain the principle of deducting expenses from corresponding heads of income, standard deduction should be restored. Besides, the limit for deduction should be Rs 50,000. 
 
The memorandum also sought removal of the provision that disallows deduction of expenditure of fees paid for professional services from an assessee’s income, unless tax is deducted from the fees paid. 
 
The person deducting the tax at source and paying the amount is, in fact, doing a service to the government. 
 
Thus to penalise him by refusing the deduction of the expenditure even for a small default is not justified, it stated. 
 
Delay of even one day in filing of return of loss deprives benefit of carry forward of loss. This, according to the chamber, is a confiscatory provision, adding salt to the injury. 
 
The memorandum has demanded that a total bar on carry forward be removed. The chamber has recommended increase in the value of asset that qualifies for 100 per cent deduction from Rs 5000 now to Rs 20,000.
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2006 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.