Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: VAT Audit
 
 
News Headlines »
 Tax Return Preparer (Amendment) Scheme, 2018
 Tax-saving for young earners simplified
 How to save income tax? Here are 6 investments with tax free income
 10 Top salary deductions that can save tax for you
 What are the tax saving options beyond Section 80C?
 The penalties for not paying tax on time
 How to make your salary tax efficient
 I-T Department may go into overdrive this quarter
 Ways to reduce the TDS deduction from your salary
 4 Tips for choosing who prepares your 2017 Tax Returns
 Processing of income-tax returns under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act which were filed in Forms ITR-1 to 6 & applicability of section 143(1)(a)(vi)

Other side of postal ballot
January, 25th 2007

Section 192A of the Companies Act, 1956, ushered in by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000, provides for:

A mandatory regime of postal ballot in respect of matters which the government deems seminal or significant;

An optional regime of postal ballot in respect of other matters requiring shareholders' consent.

The move was hailed as a step in the direction of fostering shareholder democracy. To be sure, it has several pluses. First, it overcomes the couldn't-care-less attitude of those shareholders who do not hold significant stakes so as to be movers and shakers at the company meetings.

For a company itself, it is a cost saver given the fact that a general meeting entails considerable expenses. The only expenses it incurs under the postal ballot regime are remuneration of the scrutiniser and the postal expenses. There can be considerable savings in postal expenses should a company go for the electronic mode of ascertaining shareholders' consent or dissent to a proposal by posting the issue on its Web site which of course must be tinker-proof in design and operation.

The drawbacks

But the most important drawback of the regime is it explicitly does away with the requirement of holding a meeting. In the event, a company management squirming uncomfortably at the prospect of facing a barrage of inconvenient questions from informed shareholders or a proxy packaged as a shareholder can squelch those questions even before they are asked!

What is more, the shareholders have only one side of the story the management's. The explanatory statement accompanying the resolution has always normally been a company's mouthpiece. But when resolutions are passed at meetings, a resolution is preceded by debate, which often throws up a lot more information, things that do not meet the eye.

Not uncommonly, the fate of a resolution is determined at the last minute what with the garden-variety shareholders making up their minds after hearing both the sides. This is all the more so when their votes matter, which happens when the rival groups of dominant shareholders have almost equal shareholding clout. The situation envisaged is akin to the one often witnessed in the political arena where fence sitters make all the difference to the results of the hustings. Close fight or other, the point is information should not be one-sided. Only a meeting can ensure that an issue is analysed threadbare in all its ramifications before it is voted upon.

Since Section 192A overrides all the preceding sections, including Section 166 dealing with Annual General Meetings (AGM), one may wonder whether a company management can avoid this annual affair (ritual?) by latching on to the optional regime of postal ballot for all the items of ordinary business transacted at an AGM.

Should this happen the accounts would be circulated to the shareholders for their adoption, the directors and auditors would be appointed by the shareholders from the comfort of their home and the dividend proposal would be given a thumbs up willy-nilly through post.

In that event, the shareholders cannot remonstrate with the directors for a better reward, the accounts cannot be debated much less questioned and candidates for the office of directorship cannot be made to bear scrutiny by the shareholders in terms of an informed debate.

Shareholder democracy

All these have to be accomplished through a laconic tick on the consent or dissent columns of the ballot paper, thus subverting shareholders' democracy and marginalising the garden-variety shareholders even further. One may dismiss these fears as chimerical and imaginary, a product of an overwrought mind.

But the way Section 192A(1) has been couched, the situation visualised is entirely in the realm of possibility despite the smug discounting of this possibility by the department vide its Circular No. 16 dated July 24, 2001, on the ground that holding of an AGM is mandatory in terms of Section 166.

It has not occurred to the department that the mandatory character of this solemn requirement has been diluted, nay overruled, by Section 192A so much so that a company intent on ducking the shareholders can do away with the AGM as well.

S. Murlidharan
(The author is a Delhi-based chartered accountant.)

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Website Ranking Website Ranking Company Website Positioning Alexa Ranking Website Promotion Website top 10 ranking website top 10 promotion search engine result promotion Strategic Internet Marketing Website Optimization Website Ranking Factors

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions