Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 How To File ITR Online - Step by Step Guide to Efile Income Tax Return, FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)
 Old or new tax regime for TDS on salary? This post-election 2024 event will impact your tax planning
 What Are 5 Heads Of Income Tax?
 Income Tax Dept releases interim action plan for FY25 on tax collection, refund approvals
  Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80
 Income Tax Return: 5 lesser-known tax-saving tips from Section 80
 Why you need not rush to file your ITR immediately
 Income tax returns: ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 available for e-filing
 Section 80DDB tax benefits for specified illnesses: 5 things to know
 Income tax slabs FY 2024-25: Five tips to help taxpayers decide between old and new income tax regimes
 ITR-1, ITR-2, ITR-4 forms for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) available now on e-filing income tax portal

ITAT directs Bachchan duo to cough up tax on Maruti Versa
January, 08th 2007

Bollywood icon Amitabh Bachchan and son Abhishek have been asked by a tax tribunal to pay tax on the 'Versa' car given to them by carmaker Maruti Udyog Ltd as part of their professional fees for endorsing the brand.

The case dates back to 2000, when the father and son duo entered into an agreement with the auto major for its multi-utility vehicle 'Versa'. According to the agreement, both the actors were to get Rs 4.02 crore and a Versa as professional fees. The car was delivered in 2001.

However, the Bachchans did not mention the receipt of the car to tax authorities in the income tax returns filed for the financial year 2001-02.

Later, during audit, tax officials found that the car was not shown as part of their income in 2002-03 also.

The department valued the car at Rs 6.34 lakh on the basis of its insurance certificates and directed them to pay tax by adding it as part of their professional income.

The IT department could not, however, establish the time when the car had been actually received, so it added its value to the income of the year 2001-02.

Bachchan had challenged the contention in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, saying that a car is said to be received only on the date of registration and if the registration is not done the person is not deemed to be the owner.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting