Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: VAT RATES :: form 3cd :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment
 
 
News Headlines »
 Govt extends service tax return filing date to April 30
 No move to tax farm income, clarifies Arun Jaitley
 New board for indirect taxes to become operational from June 1
  9 changes that came into effect from April 1
 First time filing income tax? Here's all you need to know about Form 16 and Form 26AS
 New Opening Financial Controller Chartered Accountant (Manufacturing Plant) A Leading Company
 Income Tax Filing 2017: All you want to know about the single page ITR form SAHAJ
 How to benefit from investments in tax saving mutual funds
 60 per cent of income tax notices on fishy cash deposits returned
 All about income tax return form Sahaj
 Why seeing Form 26AS is a must before filing tax return and how to access it

Don't withhold income tax refunds needlessly: HC
January, 29th 2007

Expressing concern over unusual delays in income-tax refunds, which have increased in recent years, the Delhi High Court has said in a ruling that the authorities cannot withhold the return of due amount to an assessee in perpetuity. A time limit has to be set, otherwise the assessee would not be able to get the refund, it noted.

The refund can be withheld only after the authorities are satisfied that the assessee will not be able to pay the tax and that the outstanding tax cannot be recovered at all if the refund is not withheld, said the court.

A mechanical invocation of powers under Section 245 of the I-T Act, irrespective of the fact situation, can lead to misuse of power by the Revenue (department) in order to delay the refund till such time a fresh demand for the subsequent assessment years is finalised. If reasonable time limits are not set for processing of and disposal of an application for refund of the amount, it may result in assessee not being able to get the refund at all, said a Division Bench of Justices Vikramjit Sen and S Murlidhar.

Section 245 of the Act, which allows tax officers in higher echelons to set off the amount to be refunded or any part of that amount against the same, if any, remaining payable under this Act by the person to whom the refund is due, is not mandatory but discretionary, said the court.

The court further said the importance of timely processing of refund claims has been underscored by stipulating the payment of interest on refunds (Section 244 A) and interest on delayed refunds (Section 243).

Unless there are sound reasons justifying the formation of an opinion that tax that has become payable cannot be recovered from the assessee as and when the issues are ultimately decided, the power under Section 245 should not be lightly invoked, said the court. The court said the revenue department, by delaying the refund, is actually incurring an additional expenditure since it has to pay interest on the amount.

The judgement cited a report of The Economic Times, which said the public accounts was concerned over the unusual delay in income-tax refunds.

As per the report, the committee had noted that delay in refunds shot up to 27.36 months in 2003-04 compared to 8 months in 1996-97.

The ruling came while directing the concerned authorities to refund the due amount, including interest, on such delayed payments to the petitioner company Glaxo Smith Kline Asia not later than February 15. The petitioner had sought refund for the assessment year 2001-02.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions