Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Direct Tax »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Net direct tax collections exceed 2023-24 target
 Govt kicks off direct tax code revision
 ITR 2024 25 Check tax department s update on TDS and refunds
 Income Tax: Why did some taxpayers receive notice for discrepancy in house rent receipt? IT Dept explains
 Income tax exemption: 4 financial instruments you can still invest into before March 31
 CBDT drops small tax demands but not TCS, TDS claims
 ITR Refund: Awaiting money from Income Tax? Here's why you have not yet received your amount
 Income Tax Notice: What to do if you receive a Section 143 (1) notice from taxman?
 Average tax return processing time cut to 10 days: CBDT
 7 types of Income Tax Notice ITR filers may receive for AY 2023-24
 ITR filing: Do these advance preparations before filing your income tax return

Delhi High Court directs Income Tax Authority to grant benefit of revised TDS rates prescribed for FY 2019-2020 and rebate of 25%
December, 24th 2020

The Delhi High Court directed the  Income Tax Authority to grant the benefit of revised TDS rates prescribed for Financial Year 2019-2020 and a rebate of 25%.

The petitioner, Manpower Services challenged the order passed by respondent authority under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 refusing to grant a certificate of tax deduction at source at Nil rate to the petitioner company.

Mr. Piyush Kaushik, counsel for the petitioner contended that the impugned order was contrary to the rule of consistency as the 1.50% rate with respect to payment under Sections 194J and 194I of the Act specified in the impugned order was three times higher than the 0.50% rate of tax deduction at source determined in the immediately preceding year by the respondent.

Mr. Kaushik stated that though the respondent itself admitted in the impugned reasons that the estimated tax liability of petitioner for the financial year 2020-21 was Nil; the average tax rate to turnover was 0.12% for the last 3 years; the existing TAN demand was Nil and the PAN demand was Rs.1,49,530 as against the huge outstanding refund of Rs.138 crores, yet the respondent stipulated TDS rate of 1.50% under Sections 194J and 194I and TDS rate of 0.50% under Section 194C on an arbitrary basis which was not based on any working.

He emphasised that it was an admitted position that vide the impugned order/reasons, the conditions of mandatory Rule 28AA were satisfied, yet the respondent had arbitrarily prescribed the aforesaid TDS rates.

Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, senior standing counsel for respondent authority submitted that the writ petition was not maintainable as the petitioner had not exhausted the alternative efficacious remedy of revision available under Section 264 of the Act. She emphasized that the petitioner had availed this remedy in the immediately preceding year.

The division bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Sanjeev Narula found that there is non-application of mind which vitiates the impugned order and reasons.

Accordingly, the court quashed the impugned order and remand the matter to authority for fresh determination in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two weeks.

In the interim, the court directed that the benefit of revised TDS rates prescribed for the financial year 2019-2020 read with a rebate of 25% given by Ministry of Finance on account of COVID-19 crisis from the rates applicable in the preceding year 2019-20 vide Press Release dated 13th May, 2020 be given to the petitioner.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting