|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Vipin Gupta B-19, Shakti Nagar Extn., New Delhi. Vs. ITO... | ACIT, Central Circle-2, New Delhi Vs. Educomp Infrastructure... » |
Shri Abhishek Agarwal S/o Sh. Shubhash Chandra Agarwal, Prop. M/s Rameshwar Prasad Subhash Chandra, Bazar Gher Munaf, Amroha-24221 Vs. ITO Ward 1(4) Amroha. |
|
December, 02nd 2019 |
Abhishek Agarwal vs. ITO/ I.T.A.No.3873/Del/2019/A.Y.2014-15 Page 1 of 4
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH "SMC" New Delhi
BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER
../ .I.T.A No.3873/Del/2019
Š Š/Assessment Year:2014-15
Shri Abhishek Agarwal ITO
S/o Sh. Shubhash Chandra Vs. Ward 1(4)
Agarwal, Amroha.
Prop. M/s Rameshwar Prasad
Subhash Chandra,
Bazar Gher Munaf,
Amroha-24221
Appellant Â/Respondent
PAN No. ALEPA3786A
Šå /Assessee by Shri K.C. Singhal, Advocate
Ö /Revenue by Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR
/O R D E R
1. This appeal filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated
30.12.2016 passed by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-Moradabad in relation to
assessment year 2014-15.
2. Assessee has raised 3 grounds of appeal which he has mentioned in
the Column 10 Form No. 36 for the sake of convenience i.e. reproduced
as under:
1. "That on the facts of the case, CIT(A) was not justified in
dismissing the appeal ex-parte in limini without serving the
Abhishek Agarwal vs. ITO/ I.T.A.No.3873/Del/2019/A.Y.2014-15 Page 2 of 4
notice on the appellant. The appellant is simply a victim on
account of laps on the part of his Counsel.
2. That order of CIT(A) is illegal since order is not passed on
merits of the case.
3. The appellant craves to raise any other ground with the
approval of the Hon'ble Tribunal."
3. At the time of hearing, Ld. Counsel for the assessee also filed
additional ground of appeal which is also reproduced as under:
"The initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s 148 of the
Act was illegal being void ab initio inasmuch as notice u/s 148
of the Act was issued during the pendency of original
assessment proceedings initiated u/s 142(1) of the I.T. Act,
1961."
4. Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that Ld. First Appellate
Authority has decided the appeal filed by the assessee ex parte without
giving opportunity of hearing which is contrary to the provisions of law.
He further submitted that Ld. First Appellate Authority can't dismiss the
appeal filed by the assessee for non-prosecution. He has to decide the
appeal on merit. Therefore, the impugned order is illegal and liable to
be cancelled. But he requested that additional ground raised by the
assessee may be admitted and issues involved in the main ground of
appeal as well as in the additional ground raised by the assessee may be
set aside to the Ld. First Appellate Authority to decide the same afresh
as per law, after giving opportunity to the assessee.
Abhishek Agarwal vs. ITO/ I.T.A.No.3873/Del/2019/A.Y.2014-15 Page 3 of 4
5. Ld. Sr. DR has not raised any serious objection on the request of
the assessee and relied upon the orders passed by the Revenue
Authorities.
6. I have heard the both parties and have gone through the orders
passed by the Revenue Authorities especially the impugned order along
with the grounds raised by the assessee specially the additional ground
and I am of the considered view that the issue involved in the additional
ground is legal. In the interest of justice and in view of the judgment of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of National Thermal
Power Company Limited vs. CIT 229 ITR 383 (SC). The additional ground
is admitted.
7. Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the present case
and the issues involved in the grounds of appeal, I am of the view that
Ld. First Appellate Authority has dismissed the appeal for non-
prosecution which is not as per the law as well as without giving
sufficient opportunity to the assessee. Therefore, in the interest of
justice, I am setting aside the issues in dispute mentioned in the ground
of appeal as well in the additional ground of appeal to the Ld. First
Appellate Authority to decide the same afresh as per law, after giving
full opportunity to the assessee.
Abhishek Agarwal vs. ITO/ I.T.A.No.3873/Del/2019/A.Y.2014-15 Page 4 of 4
8. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for
statistical purpose.
The order pronounced in the open court on 02.12.2019
Sd/-
(H.S. SIDHU)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 2nd November, 2019
*Kavita Arora, Sr. PS
Copy of order sent to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/Guard
file of ITAT.
By order
Assistant Registrar, ITAT: Delhi Benches-Delhi
Draft dictated on 25.11.2019
Draft placed before author 26.11.2019
Draft proposed & placed before the
second member
Draft discussed/approved by Second 02.12.2019
Member.
Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS 02.12.2019
Order Pronounced and Uploaded 02.12.2019
File sent to the Bench Clerk 02.12.2019
Date on which file goes to the AR
Date on which file goes to the Head
Clerk.
Date of dispatch of Order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting
|
|
|
|
|
|