Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

ACIT, Central Circle – 25, New Delhi. Vs. M/s. Saviour Builders Pvt. Ltd., BB-150, Near Choti Sabji Mandi, Janakpuri, New Delhi.
December, 02nd 2019
                                       1                      M.A No. 698/Del/2019


                    IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                        DELHI BENCH: `G' NEW DELHI

              BEFORE SH. R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                                      AND
                 MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                           M.A NO. 698/Del/2019
                                   In
                 ( I.T.A. No. 4818/DEL/2019 A.Y 2010-11)


     ACIT,                              Vs   M/s. Saviour Builders Pvt. Ltd.,
     Central Circle ­ 25,                    BB-150, Near Choti Sabji Mandi,
     New Delhi.                              Janakpuri, New Delhi.
                                             (AALCS 4258 C)

     (APPLICANT)                             (RESPONDENT)



                 Applicant by      Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Sr. D.R.
                 Respondent by     Dr. Shashwat Bajpai, Adv.


                   Date of Hearing             29.11.2019
                   Date of Pronouncement       02.12.2019


                                    ORDER
PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM


      This Miscellaneous Application is filed by the Revenue in respect of order
dated 16.04.2019 passed by the Tribunal.


2.    The Ld. DR submitted that the order of the Tribunal is not acceptable on
merit by the Revenue as per the specific provision u/s 271AAA of the Income
Tax Act thereby the assessee shall pay by way of penalty in addition to tax if
any payable by him a sum of computed at a rate of 10% of the undisclosed
                                        2                      M.A No. 698/Del/2019







income of the specified previous year. Since the assessee had already filed its
original return u/s 139(1) before the search date, therefore, A.Y. 2010-11 is not
a specified year as per the definition of section 271AAA of the Act. Therefore,
the Ld. DR submitted that penalty u/s 271AAA of the Act is not applicable in
A.Y. 2010-11 and levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act would be rightly
applicable in this case. Therefore, initiation of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c)
instead of 271AAA of the Act for A.Y. 2010-11 is a correct action taken by the
Revenue. Therefore, the Ld. DR prayed that the order dated 16.04.2019 be set
aside and the appeal be restored for fresh hearing on merit.


3.    The Ld. AR submitted that the Revenue has filed appeal before the
Hon'ble Delhi High Court being ITA No.847/2019 and the said appeal is
admitted vide order dated 09.10.2019, therefore, this Misc. Application is a
multiplicity of proceeding and becomes infructuous. Therefore, the Ld. AR
submitted that this Misc. Application be dismissed.







4.    We have heard both the parties and perused all the relevant materials
available on record. It is pertinent to note that the Hon'ble Delhi High Court
has admitted the appeal filed by the Revenue, on the same issue contested in
the present Misc. Application filed by the Revenue. Therefore, the Misc.
Application does not survive. Besides this reason, the Revenue is also seeking
review of the order dated 16.04.2019 which is beyond the scope of Section 254
of Income Tax Act, 1961. There is no mistake apparent from the record.
Therefore, this Misc. Application is dismissed.
                                       3                      M.A No. 698/Del/2019




5.   In the result, this Misc. Application filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on the 2nd day of December, 2019.

        Sd/-                                                        Sd/-

   (R. K. PANDA)                                      (SUCHITRA KAMBLE)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                      JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated:            02/12/2019
Priti Yadav, Sr. PS *
Copy forwarded to:

1.   Appellant
2.   Respondent
3.   CIT
4.   CIT(Appeals)
5.   DR: ITAT


                                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

                                                     ITAT NEW DELHI

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting