sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 Avaya India Pvt. Ltd. 202, Platina, 2nd Floor, Plot No. C-59, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra. vs. Addl. Cit Special Range-1 New Delhi.
 Sita Bhagi 83, Sukhdev Vihar, New Delhi. vs. ACIT Circle 65(1) New Delhi.
 ACIT vs. Janak Global Resources Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Chandigarh)
 DCIT vs. Rakesh Saraogi & Sons (HUF) (ITAT Raipur)
 FIS Global Business Solutions India Pvt. Ltd vs. PCIT (Delhi High Court)
 DCIT International Taxation, Circle-Noida, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector-24, Noida vs. Jaypee Sports International Ltd., Sector-128, Noida.
 Nokia India Pvt. Ltd., 1st Floor, Tower A, SP Infocity, Industrial Plot No. 243, Udyog Vihar, Phase-1, Dundahera, Gurgaon, Haryana vs. DCIT, Circle 13 (1) New Delhi
 Sh. Nafe Singh Gahlawat, H. No. 1032, Sector-14, Faridabad vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-II(3), Faridabad
 Dr. Ashok Seth, B-30, Geetanjali Enclave, New Delhi. vs. ACIT, Circle-61(1), New Delhi.
 Cheryl J. Patel vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 Hanuman Garments Private Limited, 5937, Gali No.12, Raghuvarpura-2, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi – 110 031. vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 11 (1), 4th Floor, C.R. Building, New Delhi.
 Shri Omendra Singh, Village – Shekhpuri, vs. The ACIT (OSD), Ward – 2 (1),
 Nile Tech Ltd. Asset No. 8, 3rd Floor, Worldmark-2, Aerocity NH-8, New Delhi. vs. ACIT, Circle – 18(2) New Delhi
 
 

Hanuman Garments Private Limited, 5937, Gali No.12, Raghuvarpura-2, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi 110 031. vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 11 (1), 4th Floor, C.R. Building, New Delhi.
December, 06th 2018
         IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
              DELHI BENCHES "SMC" : DELHI

     BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                    ITA.No.2096/Del./2018
                  Assessment Year 2010-2011

Hanuman Garments Private         The Income Tax Officer,
Limited, 5937, Gali No.12,       Ward ­ 11 (1), 4th Floor,
Raghuvarpura-2, Gandhi       vs. C.R. Building,
Nagar, Delhi ­ 110 031.
PAN AABCH8548N                   New Delhi.
         (Appellant)                     (Respondent)

                For Assessee :            -None-
                For Revenue : Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. D.R.

              Date of Hearing : 05.12.2018
      Date of Pronouncement : 05.12.2018

                           ORDER

          This appeal by Assessee has been directed against

the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-35, New Delhi, Dated 04.12.2017,

for the A.Y. 2010-2011.

2.        On the last date of hearing the appeal was

adjourned on the request of Learned Counsel for the Assessee

and a notice has been issued to the assessee duly intimating

the date of hearing. However, even today i.e., on 05.12.2018,

none appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any application

seeking for adjournment has been filed. It, therefore, appears
                                2
                                ITA.No.2096/Del./2018 Hanuman Garments
                                                    Private Limited, Delhi.






that assessee is no more interested in prosecuting the appeal.

The appeal of assessee is, therefore, liable to be dismissed.

3.        In view of the above and having regard to Rule 19(2)

of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules and following various

decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of

Multiplan India Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.); Hon'ble Madhya

Pradesh High Court decision in the case of Estate of Late

Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), and also the

decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B.

Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478)

wherein their Lordships held that the appeal does not mean,

mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursuing the

same. Respectfully following the same, appeal of the assessee

is dismissed as un-admitted.







4.        In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.


          Order pronounced in the open Court.


                                           Sd/-
                                          (BHAVNESH SAINI)
Delhi, Dated 05th December, 2018         JUDICIAL MEMBER
VBP/-
                              3
                               ITA.No.2096/Del./2018 Hanuman Garments
                                                   Private Limited, Delhi.



Copy to
1.   The appellant
2.   The respondent
3.   CIT(A) concerned
4.   CIT concerned
5.   D.R. ITAT `SMC' Bench, Delhi
6.   Guard File.

                    // By Order //



          Assistant Registrar : ITAT Delhi Benches :
                         Delhi.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Customer relationship management software CRM software Operational CRM Collaborative CRM

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions